Rep. Scott McInnis, R-Colo., surprised Congress and
environmentalists in November when he introduced legislation to
designate 49,800 acres of land in northwestern Colorado as the Red
Table Mountain Wilderness. The bill included provisions for
motorized recreation trails, helicopter training by the Colorado
National Guard, and guaranteed water rights for the nearby town of
Gypsum.
Richard Compton of the White River Conservation
Project says the provisions are “totally unacceptable”
and “don’t fit with wilderness values” —
especially the proposal’s inclusion of a motorcycle trail
that bisects the area.
McInnis introduced his bill when
it was too late for Congress to consider it and just as
redistricting this month will move the Red Table Mountain area out
of his district and into that of Rep. Mark Udall, D.
Compton says the proposal is simply a political strategy in
preparation for future battles over the land, which lies in the
much fought-over White River National Forest (HCN, 1/17/00: The
White River National Forest). “McInnis wants to make sure his
concerns are noticed up front.”
McInnis, however
maintains that his intentions are pure. “The congressman has
represented the area for almost 20 years,” says
McInnis’ press secretary, Blair Jones. “And he wanted
to see it protected.”
This article appeared in the print edition of the magazine with the headline Wilderness proposal or political ploy?.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
