According to a study from the Washington-based Pacific Biodiversity Institute, almost 50 percent of burned land is state, tribal or private, with an additional 35 percent under the Bureau of Land Management. Most of these fires have scorched deserts, grasslands, shrublands or sparsely forested areas, not the dense national forests that have been the center of recent political debate.
BLM staffer Don Smurthwaite is not surprised by the findings. Grassland and shrubland fires burn fast and furious, destroying large areas quickly, he says. But they are often controlled before the media can cover them. "There are more glamorous fires in national forests," he says.
The Pacific Biodiversity Institute study recommends the redirection of federal funding for wildfire management, which traditionally focuses on national forests, to tribal, state and local governments.
For a copy of the report, contact the Pacific Biodiversity Institute at 509/996-2490, or download the report at www.pacificbio.org/wildfire2001.pdf.
- Alan Toney on Study finds surprising source of Colorado River water supply
- Harvey H Reading on How do Trump and Clinton differ on conservation?
- Brett Moorhouse on How do Trump and Clinton differ on conservation?
- Laura Pandapas on The Park Service doesn’t need corporate sponsorship. It needs proper funding.
- Colleen Cabot on Meet the group that’s turning artists into nature’s advocates