After reading Louise Wagenknecht's essay (HCN, 5/7/01: The year it rained money) and Mark De Gregorio and Lester Wood's responses (HCN, 6/18/01: Smokey's secret is out), I am more than ever convinced of the danger and arrogance of the use of the word "tool" for the practice of prescribed burning. How can we be so confident as to call a force of nature a "tool"? If we are in such control of it, why do we need a "suppression" program? Or fire "fighters"? Why not fire "managers"? If we really believe that prescribed burning is like any other tool in our forestry toolbox, then I think we need to have this tool taken away from us until we know how to "use" it with more caution and humility.
Santa Fe, New Mexico
- Traci Amborn on Fracking is the big new gun
- Deb Dedon on Should the president of the Navajo Nation speak Navajo?
- Deb O'Neill on Wyoming grapples with how to fund wildlife conservation
- Bill Williams on Wyoming grapples with how to fund wildlife conservation
- Nathan Johnson on Wyoming grapples with how to fund wildlife conservation