A pack of
'Chicanos, Marines and hippies' steps into the path of New Mexico's
sprawl machine
TOME, N.M. - It's late
October, and the forest that lines the Rio Grande is lit up like a
river of gold. Huddled next to the river is Tome, a haphazard
village full of clutter and contradiction. Aging adobe houses and
double-wide trailers are scattered along dirt lanes. Dogs sleep in
the streets. Grand old cottonwood trees line irrigation ditches and
alfalfa fields.
The unincorporated town's 1,500
mostly Hispanic residents, like the trees, are rooted and
headstrong. They cuss like sailors. They go to church every Sunday.
They grouse about neighbors and nurse family grudges for
generations. And they're damn proud of their town and its history.
|
Each spring, people come from all over - some walking 30 miles from
Albuquerque - to gather on Good Friday atop Tome Hill, which rises
above the town. In September, folks flock to the plaza for the
Fiesta of Tome, where there is dancing, vendors sell roasted
chilies, and the Knights of Columbus grill hamburgers. The fiesta,
and the adobe chapel that stands next to the plaza, date back to
the days of the conquistadores, who in the 16th and 17th centuries
followed the Camino Real north along the Rio Grande from Mexico and
claimed this land for Spain.
"The old Catholic
Church is still the heart of this community," says Ray Garcia, the
mustachioed president of the Historic Tome Adelino Neighborhood
Association, as he wheels his old Ford farm truck along a dusty
ditch road. "This place is different. It's special," he says.
"There's still a community here."
Tome has
remained in a community eddy in large part because of the Rio
Grande. The river shields the village from the growth visible to
the west, just across the water, in the town of Los Lunas. There,
chain stores and mobile home dealerships line a business loop off
Interstate 25, that whisks residents quickly north to Albuquerque.
North and south of Tome, where bridges cross the river, trailer
parks and retirement communities have rushed
in.
It could happen in Tome, too. Above town, a
parched gray mesa stretches east to the Manzano Mountains. Etched
into the mesa like a sand painting is a massive web of roads.
Already, the mesa holds about 600 houses, and someday, developers
hope, the mesa, dubbed Rio del Oro or "River of Gold," could hold
60,000 to 70,000 homes.
To pave the way for that
future and to ease traffic on existing bridges, the state highway
department proposed a four-lane road from I-25, bridging the river,
to the base of Rio del Oro. The problem was, Tome stood in the way,
and many residents didn't take kindly to a highway plowing through
their back fields, a highway they feared would turn Tome into
another suburb of Albuquerque.
The fight against
the bridge looked like a long shot. All along the old Camino Real,
a new conquest is under way. Small towns are being swallowed by
trendy enclaves like Taos and Santa Fe and the subdivided sprawl
around Espanola, Albuquerque and Las Cruces. In a state
increasingly ruled by real estate, hungry for federal highway funds
and riding on loose land-use laws written in the 1920s, opposition
to growth seems futile.
The Albuquerque area is
being hit hard by this sprawl. The most recent census shows that
the city proper is actually losing residents, while its outer
suburbs continue to grow. Mayor Jim Baca and citizens' groups are
fighting to slow peripheral growth and revive the city's downtown
(HCN, 10/25/99: Monumental Chaos). But the state highway department
continues to build roads to distant suburbs. In October, it
proposed a giant beltway around
Albuquerque.
"We're doing exactly what Houston,
(Texas), did 20 years ago," says Ned Farquhar, executive director
of the smart-growth group 1,000 Friends of New Mexico. He says
Houston's beltway has made it the smoggiest city in the U.S., as
suburbanites spend hours driving to and from work. "There's an old
saying in this state that says, 'Anything that succeeds elsewhere
is doomed to fail in New Mexico,' " he says. "It's as if the
highway department has reversed that to say, 'Anything that fails
elsewhere is destined to succeed in New Mexico.'
"
Nevertheless, New Mexico is starting to talk
about reining in growth, and the battle over the Tome bridge
suggests that, with enough energy and passion, small towns may
survive this suburban onslaught. The story of Tome and
the planned bridge is hitched to a mess of New Mexico history. Give
it a tug and that history emerges like a chrome-plated Studebaker
from the bottom of a reservoir.
Subdivided Rio
del Oro once belonged to the people of Tome. In 1793, the king of
Spain gave settlers 47,000 acres of former Pueblo Indian territory,
stretching from the Rio Grande east to the ridge of the Manzano
Mountains. The grant contained everything the community would
require: farmland and water along the riverbottoms, rangeland for
cattle and sheep on the mesa, and timber on the mountainsides. A
board of trustees managed the timber and assigned residents grazing
rights on the common range.
In 1848, the Treaty
of Guadalupe Hidalgo turned New Mexico over to the United States
with a promise that the land grants would remain intact. But over
the following century, Anglos found many ways to separate Hispanics
from their land. Some were cheated or tricked, while others, such
as the residents of Tome, succumbed to the prospect of big
money.
In 1954, with the encouragement of the
state, the Tome Land Grant's board of trustees incorporated,
forming the Tome Land Improvement Co. Land-grant members became
shareholders, a situation which kicked off years of bitter
infighting, as they sued the company and one another over shares in
the grant and the legality of the
incorporation.
"It just shredded the community,"
says land grant member Tony Baca. "It's a wonder there wasn't
brothers killing brothers."
In 1978, the New
Mexico Supreme Court disbanded the Land Improvement Co., but while
the dispute was caught up in the courts, the company had sold the
land down the river. In 1968, shareholders had voted to sell the
entire 47,000-acre Tome Land Grant. The buyer, Horizon Corp., a
real estate giant involved in land speculation across the Sun Belt,
paid $4.7 million. Much of that money went to lawyers; the rest was
eventually distributed among more than 6,000 land-grant
heirs.
"The courts were just sucking us dry,"
says Baca, who was among the 78 percent of shareholders who voted
to sell the land. "What else do you do in that situation? You cut
your losses and move on." Horizon didn't waste any
time. It subdivided the mesa into thousands of quarter-acre parcels
and sold them around the country, mainly in the damp Northeast,
where people were easily romanced by the idea of a home in sunny
Georgia O'Keeffe country.
According to the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which later investigated and
prosecuted Horizon, the firm's salesmen held dinner parties where
they showed clients charts of growth rates and investment returns.
They entertained with films hosted by celebrities Merv Griffin and
Leif Erickson, promoting subdivisions with names like "Whispering
Ranch," "Enchanted Mesa" and "Paradise Hills." Diners were then
pressured to buy land immediately, or miss out on the investment
opportunity of a lifetime.
To sell land on Rio
del Oro, Horizon representatives portrayed Albuquerque as "a city
with a fence around it." Surrounded on three sides by Indian
reservations, land grants and mountains, they said, the bustling
city could only grow in one direction: south. Conveniently, a
highway had been built to relieve the growth pressure, they said,
and it led straight to Rio del Oro.
"If you had a
piece of land right here - in the only direction this city could
expand - right in the path of this stampede - would you feel you
had a pretty good investment?" a training manual instructed them to
ask. The same tactic was used to sell lots in Enchanted Mesa,
northwest of Albuquerque.
Ninety-five percent of
Horizon's investors bought the land sight unseen, according to the
FTC. The few buyers who came to the Southwest before the scam caved
in found a mess.
A story in a 1972
Seer's Journal, an underground weekly newspaper
out of Albuquerque, told of Paul and Rita Gates, a retired Chicago
couple who bought a model home from Horizon on Enchanted Mesa. The
roof leaked, the heating didn't work and the septic tank caved in.
Horizon refused to fix the problems.
George
Pafundi and his wife moved out from New York, following promises of
a 10 percent mortgage rate and a sales job with Horizon. The job
evaporated and the interest rate on the house jumped to 30
percent.
Those who came to see their land on Rio
del Oro found only a web of dusty roads, no water or sewer lines,
no electricity, no easy living.
"Horizon's
representations were fashioned out of exaggeration, innuendo,
ambiguity, half-truths and the omission of material facts," the FTC
wrote in 1981. "Horizon's lots were, in fact, bad investments with
little or no potential for profit."
The FTC
ordered Horizon to spend $45 million on promised improvements,
return $14.5 million to investors and allow others a "cooling-off
period" during which they could back out of deals with the company.
By the mid-1980s, the FTC had all but shut down Horizon, which has
since largely faded from New Mexico, along with companies such as
Norin's Realty and AMREP that also sold subdivided land grants. The
dream didn't die. Horizon had sold 75,000 parcels of land in
Valencia County to about 30,000 people who wanted their investments
to pay off. In the early 1980s, a group of property owners calling
themselves the Valley Improvement Association - VIA - stepped into
Horizon's shoes, promising to turn the mess on Rio del Oro into
gold.
The man at the heart of the association is
Bob Davey. The former Chicago journalist works in an airy office in
a remodeled strip mall in Rio Communities, a former Horizon
subdivision about ten miles south of Tome. Someday, said Davey in
October, driving his two-toned Chevy king cab pickup out across the
mesa, the sea of saltbush and sage above Tome will become a sea of
rooftops, roads, parks, businesses and ball
fields.
It's a vision that few believed in at
first, he said, but over the last two decades, Davey has brought
others on board with the patience of a missionary. Using annual
dues paid by association members, VIA has financed wells and sewer
lines, built parks and helped beef up the county sheriff's patrol
and volunteer fire department. It has also asked contractors to
abide by planning and zoning rules that have been created since the
land was subdivided, even though their legal obligation to do so is
questionable.
On Rio del Oro, the association
donated land to the University of New Mexico for a Valencia County
campus, which now serves 2,000 students. To house students and
professors, the association bought up parcels of land large enough
to build a small housing development called Pasitos del Cielo
(Little Passages to the Sky) that sits just above the old Tome
cemetery.
Farther out on the mesa, VIA has built
several schools for county kids and a larger development called Las
Maravillas (The Marigolds). Davey said the Manzano Expressway,
connecting the mesa with the towns of Los Lunas and Belen, made the
growth possible.
"The Manzano Expressway was a
gravel road when we got here," he said. "We paved and improved it,
and everybody ridiculed it as a road to nowhere. Now you drive the
Manzano and you see churches and parks and
homes."
But the parks and cookie-cutter homes are
relegated to a few tiny islands. The rest of Rio del Oro is still
ruled by saltbush, roadrunners and tarantulas. You can pick up a
quarter-acre lot at a foreclosure sale for under $100. You'll pay a
surveyor more than that to find the property for
you.
Still, with easy access to I-25 across the
Rio Grande, Rio del Oro could at last take off, said Davey. "I
think we need a
bridge."
Davey was
delighted in 1998, when the New Mexico Legislature approved $24
million in bonds to build the bridge across the Rio Grande and a
four-lane highway connecting Rio del Oro to I-25. A handful of
developers on the east mesa had been toying with the idea for a
decade. The final request had come from Valencia County, as well as
the towns of Los Lunas and Belen, which bear the brunt of commuter
traffic to and from developments on the mesa.
But
few people understood what a bridge would mean for communities such
as Tome along the east side of the river. The Legislature included
bonds for the project in a bill that funded an overhaul of
Albuquerque's Big-I Interchange before any studies had been
completed.
"All along, I've been saying I want to
be informed and we need a voice in this," said Valencia County
Commissioner Alicia Aguilar in October, "but once the money is
there, the wheels are rolling."
Tony Abbo with
the New Mexico State Highway & Transportation Department
explained that the bridge would ease traffic congestion on the
Manzano Expressway, and get commuters quickly from Rio del Oro to
jobs in Albuquerque and to the west side of the Rio Grande.
According to agency statistics, Valencia County's population will
skyrocket from 68,000 today to 123,000 by 2020, while traffic on
existing bridges across the Rio Grande will
double.
"This is not like New York, where people
can live on top of each other in real condensed areas. In New
Mexico, people like the rural lifestyle and living in suburban
America," Abbo said.
Department District Engineer
Steve Harris said people would move to the mesa with or without a
new road. He pointed to Rio Rancho northwest of Albuquerque, home
of Intel's microchip plant, which has boomed in recent years
despite deepening traffic problems. "Rio Rancho is a good
indication that don't build it and they'll still come," he
said.
Harris acknowledged that a new highway
would change the shape of growth on Rio del Oro, but said his
agency had to deal with imminent traffic and safety problems. "Some
people would like to see the highway department stop development,
but that's not our role," he said.
The agency
looked at alternatives to the bridge, said Abbo, such as expanding
State Highway 47, which rolls down the east side of the river. But
Highway 47 runs through the Isleta Pueblo, and the Indians refused
to allow the expansion, he said. The state's right of eminent
domain has no teeth on the sovereign
reservation.
News of the bridge hit the streets
when Parsons Brinkerhoff, an engineering firm, started doing
traffic studies and searching for routes across the river. One of
the seven routes it suggested ran right next to Tome's historic
plaza.
Members of the Historic Tome Adelino
Neighborhood Association were incensed. The group, which Ray Garcia
calls "a loose affiliation of Chicanos, Marines and hippies," had
formed in 1998 to fight a subdivision on Tome farmland. Growth was
already leaking into Tome, said members. Now the highway department
wanted to open the floodgates.
"These people who
move down here drive me crazy. They build a house and the first
thing they do is put up floodlights," said writer Lisa Robert, who
left her family farm near Albuquerque in the face of a similar wave
of growth. "One of these days, you're going to read about some
crazy old lady who took a .22 and went around some night shooting
out lights."
"It's not just the bridge. It's a
battle for community and culture," said Garcia. "I basically told
the state highway department that if you come through there with
bulldozers, we'll meet you tractor to
tractor."
This stubborn, rural sense of
self-preservation was backed by a certain degree of savvy. Garcia,
who works for the Small Business Development Center at the
Albuquerque Vocational Technical Institute, has a master's in
business administration. Other association members are engineers,
business owners and educators.
When the highway
department settled on a route across the river and through farmland
directly north of Tome Hill, just a half mile from the town plaza,
signs went up: "No Puente, Ni Aqui, Ni Alla. No Bridge, Not Here,
Not There, Not Anywhere." "No Bridge" bumper stickers appeared on
farm trucks and cars. The neighborhood association started meeting
each month and keeping members updated with e-mail. It teamed up
with other neighborhood groups on both sides of the river under the
name Valencia County Citizens for Responsible
Growth.
"We're not going to make the mistakes of
Southern California," said Janet Jarrett, a citizens' group member
whose family dairy would have become roadside property if the
bridge had gone in. "People should have the option to be a bedroom
community or not. By building this kind of sprawl monstrosity,
you're taking that choice away."
Wielding reams
of traffic studies and statistics, the citizens' group took the
issue to the Valencia County commission, and last fall,
commissioners voted unanimously to oppose the bridge. Although
nothing in New Mexico law says the highway department has to listen
to counties, it was a strong statement. Hoping that opposition
would die down, the highway department came back to the commission
this September. Residents showed up en
masse.
"We're this pack of honeybees just working
away," said Garcia. "They broke our hive and we're mad as hell,
just stinging everything that moves."
Once again,
the commission voted unanimously: "No
bridge."
"The commission felt that the highway
department was cramming it down their throats," said commissioner
Alicia Aguilar. "You can't just look at the bridge and say 'Build
it and they will come.' Look at what happened in the past for lack
of planning. Let's clean up our present before we leap into the
future."
While New
Mexico lags behind most of the West in terms of its land-use
planning, in 1986, Valencia County developed a zoning ordinance
that set aside areas for residential and commercial development and
required developers to provide utilities and roads to new
subdivisions. Revisions to the ordinance enacted last year, said
county planner Steven Chavez, make it one of the strictest in the
state.
"We're trying to preserve the agrarian
community, the ruralness," said Chavez.
Valencia
County can write whatever rules it wants, but the road to the
future is being paved by state agencies that have no obligation to
follow those rules, said Lora Lucero, vice president of the New
Mexico chapter of the American Planning Association, a progressive
community-planning group.
"The state highway
department and local communities are not sitting at the same
table," she said.
To make things worse, New
Mexico's land-use laws are based on federal enabling laws written
in the 1920s, she said. What reforms have been made came after the
land speculation heyday of the 1950s and '60s, when Horizon, AMREP
and other companies cut up the land with abandon. Today, statewide,
3 million lots sit awaiting homes and buildings, and any attempt to
retract these antiquated subdivisions or force their developers to
follow new rules would be treading on thin legal
ice.
Working as a lobbyist for an array of
smart-growth groups called the Coalition for a Livable Future,
Lucero is pushing state legislators to draft a series of laws that
would overhaul state planning rules. She would like the Legislature
to create a state planning commission that would set statewide
goals for protecting water and historic resources. At the same
time, state agencies would have to work within local comprehensive
plans.
"We need a balance between state guidance
and keeping planning from the ground up," she said. "Local
communities should have control of their
futures."
Lucero would also like to see a "sunset
provision," by which antiquated subdivisions would "evaporate" if
they no longer fit into comprehensive plans developed by local
communities.
The Legislature has been receptive.
Last year, it created an interim land-use committee that will make
recommendations to the Legislature, but progress has been slow,
according to the committee chair, Sen. John Arthur Smith. Smith
said tension between smart-growth advocates and developers makes
land-use planning an "impossible issue." While he had hoped to have
recommendations for the Legislature by January, he now thinks it
will be 2002 before the committee finishes its work. Final
legislation could be several years in the
making.
But Lora Lucero predicts that if the
Legislature doesn't act quickly, the people will drive growth
reform using voter initiatives such as the ones that appeared on
the ballots in Colorado and Arizona in November (HCN, 10/23/00:
Colorad's growth amendment rouses voters).
Both
smart-growth initiatives bit the dust in the face of
developer-funded ad campaigns (HCN, 11/20/00: In Arizona's growth
fight, advertising defined reality), and this fall it didn't look
as if Tome bridge opponents would fare any
better.
Despite the "no" vote from the county
commissioners, the highway department seemed undeterred. Tony Abbo
said the villages of Bosque Farms and Los Lunas and the city of
Belen, which sit to the north, west and south of Tome,
respectively, had all given the department the nod to move ahead
with the bridge.
"They (the commissioners) have a
say," said Abbo. "But we can't just take the county by
itself."
Unless bridge opponents tied the project
up in the courts, he said, construction would begin within two
years. "A good number of the property owners (whose land the new
road would cross) are saying, 'Let's be done with this chapter. Buy
us out. Let us move,' " he said.
But that wasn't
the word that bubbled up to the state capital. In mid-October, Abbo
and county planner Chavez were called to Santa Fe to speak to Sen.
Smith's Interim Land Use Committee. After listening to the two
sides of the story, Smith called the Valencia County Citizens for
Responsible Growth before the full legislative finance committee.
The group chartered a bus that carried 50 people 85 miles north to
the capital for the meeting, where the finance committee listened,
then recommended a meeting with Gov. Gary Johnson, R, who oversees
the highway department.
The governor was cordial
but cagey, according to Garcia. "He didn't say he would stop the
bridge or anything," said Garcia.
The Valencia
County Citizens for Responsible Growth were hopeful, but state
officials were noncommittal. Even pro-planning officials, such as
commissioner Alicia Aguilar, were balking at the thought of losing
millions of dollars in highway money.
Then, on
the day before Thanksgiving, state Transportation Secretary Pete
Rahn announced that he had killed the project. The $24 million
would go to another road.
While it was the first
time in his six-year stint as highway secretary that he had sunk a
project still in the preliminary study stage, Rahn said it didn't
signal a major change in the way the department does business. Many
highway projects meet resistance from citizens, he said. The
breaking point for the Tome bridge was the opposition from the
county commission.
"With divided local support,
realistically, there's no point in us going forward," he
said.
People on all sides of the issue seemed
stunned.
"I'm disappointed," said Bob Davey, who
got the news at home, as his son was arriving from college for the
holiday. "I think all of us who were supporters have to share the
blame for not getting the message across about what this project
was about. All of us are going to have to sit down and ask, 'What
does this mean?' "
Davey also predicted the
decision wouldn't stop Rio del Oro. "This is another speed bump,"
he said. "I've been at this for 20-some years, and I'll be at it
for a while longer."
Ray Garcia was out in the
yard when the call came. "I'm spending the day working with my sons
on their motorcycles, when my mom calls my wife and says, 'The
bridge is dead,' " said an elated Garcia. "You've got to hand it to
the highway department: They put up with a lot of loud mouths and
they came to the right conclusion."
Davey had
helped build support for the bridge on the state level, but to push
through a controversial project like this one, he'll need momentum
on the ground. Garcia and his allies have the grassroots support;
their challenge is to put the rules in place to make their victory
stick.
Both acknowledged that they had their work
cut out for them.
"I don't know that I have a
Plan B," said Davey.
Garcia said there's talk of
incorporating as a town, so that Tome can write its own development
rules, and forming a land trust to protect farm land. There's a
movement afoot to build a community center. Members of the old Tome
land grant are also planning a lawsuit to win back the land grant,
or at least the money to start buying it back
piecemeal.
"This fight has brought the community
back together," said Garcia, looking out his office window at the
pasture surrounding his house, the old cottonwood trees, and Los
Lunas Hill across the Rio Grande. "We still have a lot of battles
ahead of us, to protect our community and our culture. But as long
as my brother and my sons want to raise their cattle and live here,
we'll fight. I think this fight is forever."
Greg Hanscom is an associate editor at High Country News.
J.T. Thomas is a photographer and writer based in Paonia, Colorado. He is working on a documentary of Argentina's Rio Trocoman.
This story was funded in part by the New Mexico Community Foundation.
You can contact ...- The New Mexico State Highway & Transportation Department, 505/827-5100;
- The Historic Tome Adelino Neighborhood Association, P.O. Box 696, Tome, NM 87060;
- 1,000 Friends of New Mexico, 505/848-8232;
- Coalition for a Livable Future, 505/848-8232.










