"Rural communities don't catch a fair amount of the money spent on recreation," says extension economist Neil Meyer. "The money goes to the community where the recreationalists are from, and most of the economic benefits occur there." Meyer said only 3 percent of the money spent on camping is seen in the county while 97 percent is spent back at a camper's home - economically healthy cities like Boise, Salt Lake City or Pocatello. "This results in a question of fairness, not right or wrong," says Meyer. "How do we get funds to these communities? How do these communities fund search and rescue?"
The 27-page report by Neil Meyer, Aaron Harp and Kevin McGuire, Economic Impacts and Fiscal Costs of Public Land Recreation in Clark County, Idaho, is available from Meyer at the University of Idaho, Cooperative Extension System, Moscow, ID
83844-2334 (208/885-6335), e-mail:
firstname.lastname@example.org. - Juniper Davis
- Thomas Arvensis on How do we define climate pollution's cost to society?
- Gene Sengstake on Should coyote hunting contests be banned?
- Rich Jordan on Should coyote hunting contests be banned?
- Patrick Johnston on Should coyote hunting contests be banned?
- Tom Darnell on Four charts that show how public land is good for rural areas