For three decades, Tom Kovalicky worked his way up
the ranks of the Forest Service bureaucracy until he became
supervisor of the Nez Perce National Forest in Idaho during the
1980s.
Once in that position, Kovalicky
attempted to restrain the logging on the Nez Perce. That led to
clashes with the Idaho congressional delegation, and eventually
prompted him to become one of the agency's highest-ranking
whistleblowers.
Now Kovalicky is retired, and
lives in Grangeville, Idaho. But he still pays close attention to
the outfit he spent his working life
in.
"Mike Dombeck clearly has
a vision for taking the Forest Service on the path toward
redemption and re-establishing the high standards of public respect
which the agency clearly has lost," Kovalicky
says.
But Kovalicky says Dombeck must do more
than articulate a vision: "What Dombeck has got to do is give his
forest supervisors clear direction and if they don't achieve what
he wants, then have a strong talk with them. If they resist, then
get rid of them. It is important to put the fear of God in people
who are misbehaving - like those in the timber program tried to do
against those who are telling the
truth.
"When you talk about
cultural paradigm changes in an agency like the Forest Service, you
have to remember a phenomenon that occurs in a decentralized
bureaucracy. Bosses tend to gather around and reward people who act
like them. If a forest supervisor has a vision to cut trees and
build roads, then those are the kind of employees he or she will
beget."
Does Kovalicky think Dombeck can
succeed? Only if Dombeck can break the cycle, which Kovalicky says
is much like "co-dependency in a dysfunctional or alcoholic
family."
The chief must reach out in
substantial ways to rural areas that feel abandoned as a result of
the closures of ranger districts, Kovalicky says. These are the
local presences "that have represented the heart and soul of the
Forest Service for the last century."
Instead
of closing ranger districts, "they should be seeing how they can
eliminate 200 jobs in the regional offices. All studies show that
regional offices are artifacts."






