Eleven-year old Derek Uphus fears the start of school
each year because that's when local farmers near his Spokane,
Wash., home begin burning their fields and fouling the air over the
city. He suffers from cystic fibrosis and asthma and when there's
smoke in the air, Uphus coughs constantly. "It's like someone's
hands are around my neck," he says. "It feels like I'm allergic to
Spokane."
Uphus isn't alone. Thousands in the
Pacific Northwest say they suffer from the acrid smoke of burning
crop residue from wheat, barley and the biggest culprit, bluegrass,
a seed crop grown for lawns and golf courses. Burning has become a
contentious issue in eastern Washington and over the border in
Idaho as well. Both areas boast some of the nation's most fertile
agricultural territory.
Farmers have been
burning harvested land in eastern Washington and northern Idaho to
rejuvenate soil and eliminate weeds and pests for more than a
century. But burning bluegrass - after the seed harvest - became a
yearly practice only in 1963, when Washington farmers torched
16,000 acres. Bluegrass seed has since become a $130 million crop
and in 1993, farmers in both states burned an all-time-high of
100,000 acres of bluegrass, including 40,000 acres within a 40-mile
radius of Spokane. The dense smoke sometimes blotted out the sun,
and streetlights were known to go on at
midday.
The Washington Department of Ecology
monitors all crop burning, but it is unregulated across the state
line in Idaho - some six miles away - where 40,000 acres are
planted in bluegrass. Bluegrass farmers maintain a weather station
to determine when conditions are safest for burning, but if the
weather changes after the smoke is in the air, nothing can be
done.
To escape from smoke, Derek Uphus lives in
an airtight house and doesn't go outside to play. At night, he
says, he often sleeps near his parents because he's afraid he might
die. "I feel like I live in a bubble. I can't be a kid," he says.
Last year, Uphus missed 80 days of school. His mother, Diana,
blames it all on the smoke.
An
attempt to solve
the problem
To
reduce burning, Washington state has created a task force with its
first target the bluegrass burning. Last year, when public
opposition to bluegrass burning gained momentum, the state pledged
to phase out the practice within two years (HCN, 4/29/96).
Farmers have since cut the burning by
two-thirds, torching just 20,000 acres this fall. Still, many
residents doubt the problem will end soon. Patricia Hoffman,
president of Save Our Summers, a field-burning watchdog group in
Spokane, says the issue moved behind closed doors at the Department
of Ecology after bluegrass industry members met privately with the
agency's new director, Tom Fitzsimmons. Afterwards, Fitzsimmons
announced the agency would give growers "a little more time" to
come up with safer alternatives. In the meantime, burning
continues.
"The industry has been buying time
since the 1960s," Hoffman says. She argues that non-burning
alternatives, such as mechanical cutting, already exist. Farmers
say cutting is too expensive.
The state blames
the delay on the federal Clean Air Act, which requires that
alternatives to burning be "economical" and "practical." Such
terms, says Department of Ecology spokeswoman Jani Gilbert, are
open to interpretation.
"We already have the
research," she says, "but we need to get legal help to define the
criteria." Gilbert is optimistic that the agency will certify an
alternative that meets the criteria by the end of 1998.
Two states,
two
burning
policies
Washington's phase-out policy has helped
a little. For the first time in five years, Derek Uphus didn't
spend August in the hospital. However, his asthma still flared up
because of smoke that reached Spokane from Northern Idaho, where
burning is allowed under the state's Right to Farm
law.
During the week of Sept. 21, farmers torched
hundreds of acres of wheat stubble on Idaho's Rathdrum Prairie.
Hoffman took aerial photographs of the smoke "coming straight into
the Spokane Valley." At the same time, she says, hospital
admissions for respiratory problems doubled in Spokane, with most
of the complaints in Spokane County about smoke blowing in from
Idaho.
Dan Redline, air quality specialist for
Idaho's Division of Environmental Quality, says Idaho does not
consistently violate federal air quality standards. But that
doesn't mean the air is clean. Instead, the standards may not be
designed with field fires in mind. "The standard monitors air
quality from midnight to midnight the following day (on a 24-hour
average,)" Redline says. "And traditionally, we've always adopted
the federal standards."
But bluegrass is burned
just a few hours a day, and the smoke creates an intense short-term
problem. Redline questions whether federal rules are adequate to
protect public health.
Meanwhile, northern Idaho
bluegrass farmers burn with impunity. In August, eight of the
Rathdrum Prairie's 20 bluegrass farmers agreed to a voluntary,
10-year phase-out plan affecting only 5,000 acres. The plan was
initiated by an Idaho seed company, but when the company changed
management, the farmers put to flame nearly all the region's 40,000
acres, including those acres of bluegrass involved in the
phase-out.
Art Long, spokesman for the Clean Air
Coalition in Idaho, wants the state to take responsibility for
eliminating field-burning crop residue. But, he says, "Idaho's
Legislature is controlled by farm groups, and anything to do with
farming is OK. It is a very exploitative mind-set."
For now, Spokane residents will continue to
endure smoke coming from Idaho. "Ideally, we'd like to see
Washington eliminate burning," Long says, "and then turn around and
sue Idaho."
Meanwhile, the Uphus family attends
public hearings and has spoken with Washington Gov. Gary Locke, who
has expressed concern about the health of Spokane residents and
urged the Department of Ecology to speed the search for burning
alternatives.
"Besides moving away," says Diana
Uphus, "what more can we do?"
* Sara
Phillips,
HCN
intern
You can contact
...
* Save Our Summers at P.O. Box 142043,
Spokane, WA 99214 (509/928-2417), or,
* The
Department of Ecology at N. 4601 Monroe St., Suite 202, Spokane, WA
99205
(509/456-2926).






