You are here: home   Blogs   The Range Blog   Public transportation systems come at a high price
The Range Blog

Public transportation systems come at a high price

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

josephtaylor | Jan 10, 2011 11:50 AM

Last weekend the New York Times reported on efforts to develop a fast train from Los Angeles to San Francisco.  Being a rider myself—I am writing this on the Cascades run south—and knowing how appealing European trains are and how outdated, inefficient, and unreliable North American trains are, I read the article with a sinking feeling. The California route’s first section, dubbed by critics “the train to nowhere” because it runs from Bakersfield to Borden in the central valley, will be a political battlefield for at least a decade. 

 

Animation of Bakersfield high speed rail courtesy California High Speed Rail Authority.

Admittedly this is a dark view, but it stems less from cynicism than historical perspective. America has seen many convulsive transportation revolutions. Canals, railroads, highways, and airports were all contested, and each was a mixture of wisdom and folly similar to now. Roads in the early republic were awful. Economic activity was constrained to areas close to navigable streams or towns. Fifteen land miles away was beyond the market.  This inspired efforts to create canals that extended and captured production. As environmental historian Christopher Jones notes, even these earliest works were heavily subsidized. This was equally true of later technological innovations, including the epic graft accompanying transcontinental railways and the grubbier scandals dogging highway construction. Public money has always underwritten American transportation development, and audits reveal the vast majority—the Erie Canal a conspicuous exception—did not pay for themselves. Thus fiscal conservatives have a point when critiquing money thrown at high-speed rail.  It is an obtuse, often insincere point, but it is valid.

Unfortunately, the math gets messier when we expand the tally. The toll on laborers was incalculable. No one knows just how many people were killed or incapacitated digging ditches, laying rails, and paving roads, but the number would no doubt cause queasiness. Many understand transportation’s role in the dispossession of native peoples. Few contemplate reparations. Every technology irrevocably altered nature.  Canals lured invasive species. Trains ignited forests. Roads buried waterways. Cars and planes polluted lungs.  Each route did open opportunities, albeit more slowly than boosters promised, but the costs went unacknowledged: communities in decline when lines passed them by, shrinking agricultural prosperity as production expanded, and widespread disaffection as captains of industry and corporations charged what the traffic would bear. Now most Americans travel these paths without a second thought to the costs.

One reason I despise current politics is its dishonest discourse. Every opportunity has a cost and every cost an opportunity. Almost no one admits this consistently. The only statement from the NYT piece I can fully embrace is by Roelof van Ark, chief executive of the California High-Speed Authority, who said “It’s not about today; it’s about the future.” That is the sole stable truth in debates about transportation development. I like trains. I can reduce my carbon footprint and work while commuting. I am persuaded that a network of modern rail routes will be better for nature and, as Janet Pack argued two decades ago, public transit is good for society. That said, fast trains are not panaceas, balance sheets are not unambiguous, and my preference is not without costs. In our world, however, such an admission marks me as a loser. While many politicians like full cost accounting when they want to complicate an opponents’ agenda, none want critical light cast on their own cause. What I most wish—other than it did not take sixteen hours to travel back and forth between Portland and Vancouver, and will Amtrak please turn on the Wifi—is that we have an honest discussion about all the opportunities and costs of all our transportation options.

Joseph Taylor teaches in the history department at Simon Fraser University, in Vancouver. He is the author of Pilgrims of the Vertical: Yosemite Rock Climbers and Nature at Risk, which won the National Outdoor Book Award, and Making Salmon: An Environmental History of the Northwest Fisheries Crisis, which won the American Society of Environmental History’s best book award. He lives in Oregon.

Essays in the Range blog are not written by High Country News. The authors are solely responsible for the content.

Public transportation systems come at a high price
David Waight
David Waight
Jan 14, 2011 02:08 PM
I have to agree that we need to have an honest discussion about all the opportunities and costs of all transportation options. Unfortunately, the current discussions tend to lean towards the opportunities of roads and driving and the costs of high speed rail and other public transportation. A recent article in the Huffington Post (January 4th) exposed the myth that highways costs are completely covered by user fees. An honest discussion if possible will go a long way towards emphasizing the fact that all forms of transportation are subsidized, only the form of subsidy is different and sometimes not as visible.
Full cost accounting
Joseph Taylor
Joseph Taylor
Jan 15, 2011 07:41 PM
Phineas Baxandalls' piece (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/[…]/iin-the-public-interesti_b_804391.html) in The Huffington Post makes a necessary point. The costing gets even more unbalanced when we look to surface streets and especially to suburban sprawl. Our present transportation grid has thrived by not asking the sort of questions that critics of lightrail and fast trains insist be asked of these systems.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Rancher vs BLM: a 20-year standoff ends with tense roundup |
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  4. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  5. The future of the Sacramento Delta hangs in the balance | But few Californians seem to grasp what is at stak...
  1. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  4. Will the Colorado River reach the Gulf of California once more? | Photographs of last month's historic water pulses....
  5. Locals resist a Bakkenization of the Beartooths | South-central Montanans oppose new drilling, forew...
HCN Classifieds
Subscriber Alert
More from Growth & Planning
Why homes are lost to wildfire This Forest Service expert says it's as much a sociopolitical problem as it is physical.
Fracking fuels the post-Recession economy and growth
Does Juneau in Southeast Alaska really need this highway? A proposed road is destructive, dangerous and bound to be ridiculously costly.
All Growth & Planning
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone