You are here: home   Blogs   The Range Blog   Feinstein and Westlands – who’s running whom?
The Range Blog

Feinstein and Westlands – who’s running whom?

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

felicep | Mar 07, 2010 12:15 PM

There has been an interesting development in the ongoing story of Big Ag v fish in the Great Central Valley of California. Back in January HCN featured an article by Matt Jenkins on that conflict and in particular on the part played by the powerful corporate farmers of the Westlands Water District on the West side of the San Joaquin Valley which extends south from San Francisco Bay.

In spite of the fact that Westlands holds only junior water rights, the powerful District has been able to secure a lion’s share of available irrigation water – that is until the federal Bureau of Reclamation was so hemmed in by drought and ESA court decisions that it could simply no longer deliver the water which Westland’s corporate farmers desired.

Matt Jenkins reported what happened next. Essentially Westlands partnered with conservative members of Congress to take a run at the Endangered Species Act. Like all other Ag interests that have been faced with complying with the powerful endangered species law, Westlands wanted an exemption; let the tiny Delta Smelt get along with less water during the drought so that Westlands could continue to have all the water it desires.

Jenkins reports that Dianne Feinstein – a politician who has always been eager to do the bidding of Westlands and its generous campaign donors – was so furious with the move that she “shook her fist” at Westland’s general manager Tom Birmingham.

The picture Jenkins portrays is of an apologetic and contrite Tom Birmingham. The Westland’s manager protests that District leaders made a “terrible, terrible mistake” by going behind Feinstein’s back.

Subsequently, however, Ms. Feinstein has sought to do precisely what Tom Birmingham and the super-wealthy members of the Westlands Water District wanted but which Republicans could not deliver – an ESA exemption which would allow the water to again flow toward the big money on the West side of the San Joaquin Valley. Matt Jenkins also reported on that move by the senior senator from California as did just about every  reporter and blogger who writes on California fish and water issues. Here are links to two of the best among those reports and blog posts – one from the Trout Underground and another from the Fish Sniffer

Careful study of the reports suggests that Westland’s Tom Birmingham knew exactly how Feinstein would react to Westland's mating dance with Republicans. In fact, you can bet that the message to Feinstein was intentional: if you do not do our bidding, the Republicans will become our champion and they – not you – will get the big campaign bucks. Subsequent events confirm that it is indeed the dog that wags the tail and not – as the first Jenkins article suggested – the tail wagging the dog.

In case you were wondering, Feinstein is the tail.

_____________________________

For those who want to track California’s ongoing Central Valley water drama I recommend the website of the Restore the Delta coalition.    

Scheming away our democracy
Wes Rolley
Wes Rolley
Mar 09, 2010 08:18 AM
Those who pay close attention to this issue will soon understand the degree to which those with power isolate themselves from the realities of living in areas like the Delta. Case in point: the fact that Feinstein refused to meet with representative from Restore the Delta, but obviously Westlands has easy access to her office.

Consider also the fact that politicians load up commissions with those who will render opinions that help the politicians career. Thus, the very first appointment to the SacDelta Stewardship Council is not from the Delta, but was Gloria Gray, a member of the board of the Metropolitan Water District whose ever growing need is to take as much water from the Delta as they can. I have absolutely no faith that any member of the Council will actually represent Delta Interests.

This is common practice now in California. Step 1. Establish a commission or council to make decisions. Step 2. Appoint friendly voices to make the rules. Step 3. Make sure that you only get input from those who support what you want to do. Step 4. Wait for the law suits since that is the only recourse for public input.

That was the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force. That is currently the method of implementing the fast tracked Marine Life Protection Act. That is the way the Delta Stewardship Council is unfolding.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. Why I am a Tea Party member |
  3. The privatization of public campground management | All the info you need to decide whether you love o...
  4. Efficiency lessons from Germany |
  5. The Latest: Interior commits to restoring bison on select lands | The “odd ungulate out” gets a tentative win.
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. A graceful gazelle becomes a pest | Inrroducing an African gazelle called the oryx for...
  3. What's killing the Yukon's salmon? | An ecological mystery in Alaska has scientists and...
  4. Plains sense | Ten years after Frank and Deborah Popper first pro...
  5. North Dakota wrestles with radioactive oilfield waste | Regulators look at raising the limit for radiation...
HCN Classifieds
Subscriber Alert
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone