Personal tools
You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Why Bush promotes drilling ANWR
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
 
The GOAT Blog

Why Bush promotes drilling ANWR

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Felice Pace | Jul 15, 2008 12:00 AM

This morning on the news show Democracy Now! Amy Goodman asked energy guru Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute why the Bush Administration continues to push drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). The question was in response to Lovins’ assertion that oil corporations don't want to drill in ANWR because of the difficulties, expense and lack of effective security along the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. Goodman then asked Lovins why – if that is the case – the Bush Administration continues to push drilling ANWR. Lovins said that he didn’t know the reason.

Since Bush first proposed it, I’ve believed drilling ANWR is promoted as a straw dog.

Bush et al understand the core dysfunction of the environmental establishment: all the large “nationals” think they must be seen as THE group – or at least one of the main groups - defending the highest profile environmental issues. The Bush Administration uses this knowledge to "force" the environmental establishment to spend most of their staff resources "defending" ANWR and other high profile places. The establishment merrily goes along with the charade because it is good for fundraising.

As a result, high profile environmental issues are worked on by a gaggle of staffers from a dozen or so organizations. Coordination is difficult; the staffers compete as well as cooperate. Meanwhile grassroots and community groups throughout the West struggle against extended leasing and drilling on our public lands without the support they should have from the environmental establishment. It has been much easier for the Administration to extend leasing and drilling on the rest of the public domain because they have promoted drilling ANWR.

Leasing the public domain for energy development is only one of the opportunity costs of the environmental establishment diverting too many resources to too few high profile issues. Staff members at the largest environmental organizations are also diverted from work on non-energy issues. An example is the Klamath River Basin. The national organization staffer who was working with the Klamath Basin Coalition to reform management of the complex of Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuges at the time Bush assumed the presidency was abruptly pulled away from this work to focus on ANWR. He has never returned and the campaign to reform Klamath Refuge management has stalled.

For much of its history the environmental establishment advanced staffers who cut their teeth as grassroots activists. One result was campaigns like the Ancient Forest Alliance which succeeded because it harnessed grassroots and national strengths, creating a powerful synergy. Now most staffers working in the establishment are drawn from professional schools; they have no grassroots experience and consequently little appreciation for the importance of the thousands of low profile struggles carried forward by grassroots environmentalists. One of the most important consequences is the environmental establishment's unconscious collusion with those forces which seek to keep it focused on a few high profile issues while these forces despoil the Earth through thousands of smaller assaults which, for the most part, proceed under the national radar.

 

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. The hoof stops here | A proposal to reopen slaughterhouses in the U.S. f...
  2. From gust to gale | So-called "grass-roots" opposition to wind may be ...
  3. Frack fricasee | Election-year politics (partially) hijack Interior...
  4. A Mexican rancher struggles to shift from cattle to conservation | In Northwest Mexico, rancher Carlos Robles Elías ...
  5. The Pawnee Buttes oversee a changing landscape | Eastern Colorado’s Pawnee Buttes have witnessed ...
  1. Micah True, born to run | Remembering Micah True – known as “Caballo Bla...
  2. A final hats off to rancher Doc Hatfield | With the help of his wife, Connie, and a bunch of ...
  3. Balancing fish and farms on a Washington estuary | A restoration effort at Fisher Slough in Washingto...
  4. The truth about wolves is hard to find | Some hunters claim wolves are killing too many dee...
  5. Retirees join environmentalists in fighting Arizona copper mine | The conservative, golf-playing retirees of Queen V...
More from Energy
It’s the pits New Mexico’s conservative pols rage against one of the nation's strictest oil and gas rules
From gust to gale So-called "grass-roots" opposition to wind may be centrally organized by powerful conservative think tanks and funded by oil and gas
The Pawnee Buttes oversee a changing landscape Eastern Colorado’s Pawnee Buttes have witnessed so many historical changes that they’re likely to survive the current energy-development boom.
All Energy

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2012 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

- The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

- An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis