You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Watts or Wildfire
The GOAT Blog

Watts or Wildfire

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

terrays | Apr 21, 2009 10:11 AM

Here's a new angle on fire in the west: one large southern California utility is trying to convince ratepayers that some regions of its service area are too fire-prone for uninterrupted electricity. Or at least, that's the implication behind San Diego Gas and Electric's proposal to unplug portions of its grid when there's a high risk of fire; for example, when winds pick up or humidity levels drop beyond a certain point. According to spokeswoman Jennifer Ramp, the plan is an attempt to "address fire head on," but it also looks a lot like an effort to dodge liability. In 2007, arcing power lines and gusting Santa Ana winds stirred up a handful of big blazes, leaving San Diego Gas and Electric saddled with more than a hundred lawsuits, and potentially responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars of damages. 

The utility's proposal has met with a mixed response -- a slightly mixed response. Mostly, the 130,ooo ratepayers who might be affected seem to consider the idea a terrible one. Here's a local paper's description of one public meeting:

There was even someone in the crowd who was neutral.

Shawneen Burdick, the president of the Valley Center Chamber of Commerce, who said she was representing herself, said, "I personally am still on the fence."

But most suggested the plan was a disaster in the making.

Scott Wayne of Black Canyon City, Ariz., a Marine whose father lives in the San Diego County backcountry, said the proposal was surprising given that one of the military's top strategies is to knock out electric systems.

"It bothers me that this is a planned disaster," Wayne said. "This is a tactic that we use against the enemy."

Residents have pointed out that unplugging the grid won't prevent all fires, and worry that if a fire does occur when the lines are dead they'll be caught without functioning water pumps, without electric light, and potentially without telephone, internet or cable service as well.

The plan has yet to be approved by California's Public Utility Commission, which will probably make a decision by mid summer. Christopher Chow, a spokesman for the commission said he couldn't think of another utility, in California or elsewhere, that had taken a similar step.       

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. A graceful gazelle becomes a pest | Inrroducing an African gazelle called the oryx for...
  3. What's killing the Yukon's salmon? | An ecological mystery in Alaska has scientists and...
  4. Plains sense | Ten years after Frank and Deborah Popper first pro...
  5. North Dakota wrestles with radioactive oilfield waste | Regulators look at raising the limit for radiation...
More from Politics & Policy
The battle for women’s suffrage continues
The Tea Party loses one
Reflections on the Wilderness Act at 50 The concept may need some rethinking, but it's still an important way to preserve some of our most treasured land.
All Politics & Policy
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone