You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Utah denied claim to road in Canyonlands National Park
The GOAT Blog

Utah denied claim to road in Canyonlands National Park

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Jodi Peterson | May 13, 2014 08:50 AM

High Country News has been around for 44 years now … and sometimes it feels like we’ve been covering certain stories for darn near that long too. Like the Animas-La Plata water project in southern Colorado, meant to fulfill the Utes’ water rights, or the Central Arizona Project, which supplies Phoenix, Scottsdale and other major water users. Another perennial issue is R.S. 2477, that antique law that gave early settlers the right to build highways across public land – and now causes major headaches for land management agencies.

Passed in 1866, Revised Statute 2477, said, in its entirety, that "the right-of-way for the construction of highways across public lands not otherwise reserved for public purposes is hereby granted."  The law was repealed in 1976, but since then, those simple words have been the source of huge controversy and a large pile of lawsuits.

Western counties have used the statute to try to get control over routes on public land, so that they can re-open them to vehicles and improve or maintain them. All too often, though, the routes are not bonafide thoroughfares, but rather dubious, long-abandoned tracks – old prospector trails, cowpaths, and sandy washes, many in national parks, monuments and wilderness study areas (for background see our stories "Road warriors back on the offensive" and "The Road to Nowhere").

4072054725_a5dfed3990_z.jpg
Salt Creek in Canyonlands National Park. Photograph by Flickr user Chris M. Morris.

Starting in 2011, the state of Utah and 22 counties began filing lawsuits against the federal Bureau of Land Management, seeking rights-of-way on 36,000 miles of old “roads” that they claim were in regular public use before the 1976 repeal. The first of these cases was decided last August, and seemed like a reasonable compromise on roads that had a legitimate history of usage. Juab County got rights-of-way on three routes, but can’t widen or pave them, and it also had to relinquish its other R.S. 2477 claims. The settlement also required the BLM to re-open a closed access road.

Now, another of Utah’s R.S. 2477 lawsuits has just been settled – and the state and county lost. On April 25, a federal appeals court put an end to local attempts to re-open the Salt Creek route in Canyonlands National Park. The Salt Creek Canyon is the largest drainage in the Needles District. The nine-mile-long road down the canyon goes to spectacular Angel Arch, but it crosses Salt Creek countless times. Jeeps and off-highway vehicles traveling the route were polluting the water and harming streamside plants, birds and other wildlife, and in 1998 the Park Service closed the route to vehicles, leaving tourists to walk to the arch.  In 2004, Utah and San Juan County filed an R.S. 2477 suit to reopen the Salt Creek route. Seven years later, a district court denied the claim. The state and county appealed, but now the appeal has been denied and the closure upheld. In total, local governments spent more than $1 million fighting for this single road.

Legal experts say the decision is precedent-setting and raises the bar for R.S. 2477 claims: Use of the route by cattle ranchers, prospectors and tourists was not enough to establish the “continuous use” required for a public highway. However, the Utah attorney general’s office and the counties say they intend to keep battling for local control over another 14,000 roads on public lands. And decades from now, we’ll still be writing about this pesky frontier law and its modern fallout.

Jodi Peterson is the managing editor of High Country News.

Carolyn Hopper
Carolyn Hopper Subscriber
May 13, 2014 11:50 AM
Thank heavens the decision went the right way.
Richard Crow
Richard Crow
May 13, 2014 04:31 PM
Did it go the right way? It is a matter of perspective. Many people can't walk or walk far. I am one of them.
Robert Krantz
Robert Krantz Subscriber
May 13, 2014 06:35 PM
So, Richard, should we pave it all?
Mike Sennett
Mike Sennett Subscriber
May 14, 2014 10:22 AM
Angel Arch is high on my list of Utah destinations & I am very happy that Salt Creek & my adventure won't be ruined by ATVs. Three cheers for SUWA & all the eco-warriors fighting these RS 2477 claims in the courts. Where would we be without them ? The Utah Rivers Council deserves accolades too. Anyone who loves the land & water in Utah should be supporting these people on the front lines of preserving the irreplaceable resources on the public lands we all own.
Adam Neff
Adam Neff Subscriber
May 19, 2014 12:53 PM
Alternative headline: "Prosperous times continue for Utah lawyers!"
Jennifer Russell
Jennifer Russell Subscriber
May 20, 2014 12:02 PM
Hooray! My all-time favorite run in the universe is from the top of the Salt Creek drainage from Cathedral Butte to Peekaboo. I never could imagine cars there!

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. A graceful gazelle becomes a pest | Inrroducing an African gazelle called the oryx for...
  2. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  3. The man behind a New Mexico county's fracking ban | Last year Mora became the first county in the nati...
  4. Plains sense | Ten years after Frank and Deborah Popper first pro...
  5. What's killing the Yukon's salmon? | An ecological mystery in Alaska has scientists and...
More from Recreation
The death of backpacking? Younger people don’t seem interested in this outdoors tradition.
The privatization of public campground management All the info you need to decide whether you love or hate that the Forest Service uses concessionaires.
The Big Nasty On garbage and tolerance in the wilderness.
All Recreation
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone