You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Too much poop can be hazardous to your health
The GOAT Blog

Too much poop can be hazardous to your health

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Stephanie Paige Ogburn | Oct 10, 2011 05:00 AM

Should large quantities of manure from giant commercial farms be considered hazardous waste?  They're not right now, and at least 14 members of Congress want to keep it that way. The group, which includes Idaho Representative Mike Simpson (R), recently signed on to the Superfund Common Sense Act, a bill that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from ever classifying manure mountains as a hazardous.

Why does this matter? Because if EPA ever did decide manure was hazardous, it could be regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (referred to as Superfund), the only environmental law in the country that allows local and state authorities (who bear the brunt of pollution problems and cleanup costs) to recoup cleanup costs from those who made the mess in the first place. It would also require emissions to be reported under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act.           

Okay, so maybe you're thinking -- but manure isn't hazardous! I just got a truckload of horse manure or chicken litter from my neighbor. And I'm going to till it into my garden and boy are my cucumbers going to take off next year!

In this case, it's all about quantity -- multiple studies have demonstrated that when farms collect tons of untreated manure in one place it releases pollutants into air (PDF) and water (sub req'd) that are deleterious to human health. And contrary to what factory farm advocates tell you, the EPA, if it ever did decide to consider manure hazardous, would not be giving Superfund status to a 60-cow dairy in Wisconsin or California organic farmer applying manure as grapevine fertilizer.

Rather, it might choose to classify as toxic giant spill areas, like the New River in North Carolina, which, way back in 1995, was subject to a 25.8 million gallon manure flood, as Rolling Stone reporter Jeff Tietz reported in a 2008 story for the magazine:

 

The biggest spill in the history of corporate hog farming happened in 1995. The dike of a 120,000-square-foot lagoon owned by a Smithfield competitor ruptured, releasing 25.8 million gallons of effluvium into the headwaters of the New River in North Carolina. It was the biggest environmental spill in United States history, more than twice as big as the Exxon Valdez oil spill six years earlier. The sludge was so toxic it burned your skin if you touched it, and so dense it took almost two months to make its way sixteen miles downstream to the ocean. From the headwaters to the sea, every creature living in the river was killed. Fish died by the millions.

 

Manure lagoonRegulating manure as a hazardous substance would also make it so giant animal facilities (we probably shouldn't even call them farms) are required to report their air emissions.  And while the health implications of emissions from large Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, or CAFOs is still an emerging field of study, researchers have documented illness and even death stemming from exposures to large quantities of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide from factory farms, and over 300 different kinds of volatile organic compounds have been identified coming off of swine facilities.

The emergence of the Simpson-sponsored "shit ain't toxic" bill at this time points to fears that the Obama EPA might actually fulfill one of the candidate's campaign promises and crack down on pollution from large animal operations -- a promise that some say helped him win in the Iowa primaries. (Iowa ranks first in the country in its number of hog CAFOs)

It isn't the first time politicians have rushed to the aid of the "family farms" they say will be hurt by supposed regulatory overreach. Similar bills attempting to legally establish manure's benign nature popped up in 2005 and 2006. Although they didn't go anywhere, the Bush-era EPA stepped up and said they wouldn't apply Superfund to CAFOs.

Obama's EPA may step up to the regulatory plate. But if they do, be prepared to watch the manure fly.

Stephanie Paige Ogburn is the online editor at High Country News.

Image of a manure lagoon in California courtesy the author.

Mark Brooks
Mark Brooks
Oct 10, 2011 10:08 AM
I am wondering what the differences between CAFO and what is called in this state (Virginia)'biosolids'; other than the fact that biosolids are mandated and are human waste sludge. The Supreme Court of VA ruled 9 years ago that a county could NOT opt out of the spreading of this on farm fields.

According to what I have been able to find out, the ending of this practice has been either not asking the EPA, or that EPA has not finished studying the subject yet.

I think it is disgusting, especially since food is being grown in these fields for human consumption (both vegetables and animals).

Thank you.
John W Stephens
John W Stephens Subscriber
Oct 10, 2011 05:20 PM
Since the rank of Iowa in the number of CAFOs in the US has been added, you should probably subtract the "TK" comment from that 'graf.
rakashawn
rakashawn
Oct 12, 2011 03:23 PM
Thanks Stephanie for the great blog. I believe that biosolids and manures can be handled and utilized responsibly. Unfortunately, neither seems to be the case here. Our soils have metabolized excrement for eons, but never in such large concentrations applied to a small area.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  2. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  3. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  4. Save our gauges | Important USGS stream gauges imperiled by austerit...
  5. Rants from the hill: Trapping the bees | What to do when 50,000 honeybees hive up inside th...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  3. How technology detected a huge mine landslide before it happened | Employees at a Kennecott copper mine outside Salt ...
  4. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  5. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
More from Climate & Pollution
Winter: an encore edition The author celebrates the (temporary) return of winter in Montana
Mixed messages on methane And why you shouldn't make too much of any of them -- yet
Mapping your way to better health California is a test-ground for the new field of Geomedicine
All Climate & Pollution

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.