You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Recession in the gasfield?
The GOAT Blog

Recession in the gasfield?

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Jonathan Thompson | Nov 20, 2008 10:40 AM

Last weekend, the family and I drove over to Grand Junction, Colo., about an hour away from here, to run some errands. GJ, as we call it, is the metropolitan and service center of Colorado's Western Slope. In other words, it's awash with malls, big boxes, strip malls and fast food chains, not to mention the biggest airport and hospital around.

GJ is also a gasfield town. And for the last year or so, that's helped the city prosper while the rest of the nation's economy slides downward: Unemployment is way below the national average, home prices continue to stay high, and the wages are good. This spring, Burger King became famous for advertising a $300 signing bonus to lure burger-flippers. HCN covered the thriving gasfield economy in its "Boom Boom" cover story.

But now, natural gas prices are collapsing, dropping more than 20 percent in recent months. Drilling is declining nationwide, and there are signs the slump will hit Colorado's gasfields. Chevron just announced that it will slow its pace of development in Western Colorado, as have Williams Production and Bill Barrett Corp. Even a few less drill rigs could have a big impact, since each employs about 35 highly paid workers.

This boom has been so big, though, that a little dip will, by no means, equal a bust. Last month, the Colorado Oil and Gas Commission set a record for the number of drilling permits issued, and it's already issued 6,739 permits statewide -- already breaking last year's record.

That's enough, I guess, to give shoppers in Grand Junction confidence. As we drove into town on the grand new bypass "parkway," I fully expected to see ghostly malls and empty shops. Instead, we had a tough time finding a parking spot. The teeny-bop accessory store, Claires, had a line out the door. And people were opening up their wallets left and right. But perhaps the busiest place we saw was Victoria's Secret, where women lined up several deep at the two cash registers.

Bustiers, apparently, don't lose their appeal, even with when a bust looms on the horizon.

 

 

Meanwhile, in the great white north. . .
Sarah Gilman
Sarah Gilman
Nov 20, 2008 01:12 PM
Something similar is afoot in the oil fields of the eastern Montana's Bakken Formation, where a well might cost between $5 million and $8 million to drill:
http://www.billingsgazette.net/[…]/18-oilprices.txt

The state has been relatively well insulated through the economic crisis so far, even projecting a two year budget surplus of up to a billion dollars. I wonder how that number will change, given the changing calculus of the oil and gas fields as prices continue their precipitous downslide. . .
Blaming it on the regs
niko
niko
Dec 11, 2008 10:52 AM
With gas prices falling from $13 a MMBtu to $6.50 and oil from $150 a barrel to $55, I don’t see how development isn’t going to slow down, at least for a while. The thing that drives me crazy is some oil and gas companies in Colorado are blaming the new regulations coming out of the COGCC rulemaking process for declining development:

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_11065985?source=bb

I quote: “’There are a number of variables,’ Felton said. ‘There is the uncertainty surrounding policies that relate to a new administration nationally. ... Of course, there's the Colorado rule-making.’”

What a joke. What a blatant lie. The COGCC rulemaking is making ZERO difference right now in decreased oil and gas development in CO. Don’t try to stretch this into being even a contributing factor for the predicted slow in development. The price of oil fell 200%. Are you telling me that a new restriction asking companies to line their reserve pits is even a drop in the bucket compared to the free fall that prices are undergoing? ROTFLMAO! The price of gas falls by 100% and your panties are in a wad about a rule asking companies to consult with DOW? Uh-hu, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

If the reasons above don’t already make it ludicrous that a few regulation tweeks are driving industry out of Colorado, try this one: The rules have not even gone into effect yet. Several rules won’t be applied until 2011. Yeah, I’m sure that’s making a difference now.

Check out the dates that the rules go into effect here:
http://cogcc.state.co.us/RuleMaking/Del ... 102408.pdf

Some in the industry are just poor losers and wants to take every opportunity possible to hurt Ritter and those supporting protecting our environment. Little jabs about new regs being a factor in decreasing development in Colorado are nothing more than the industry keeping up the smoke screen to lie to the public. Sorry guys, we know better.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  2. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  3. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  4. Save our gauges | Important USGS stream gauges imperiled by austerit...
  5. (Still) getting the lead out | When will hunters stop poisoning condors with ammu...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. Sacrificial Land: Will renewable energy devour the Mojave Desert? | An unlikely group of activists is championing a ne...
  3. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  4. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
  5. How technology detected a huge mine landslide before it happened | Employees at a Kennecott copper mine outside Salt ...
More from Energy
BLM fracking rules just got more industry-friendly Feds weaken a proposal that many enviros say wasn’t strong enough in the first place
Rooftop solar is killing your utility! But don't write a eulogy yet
Wyoming's pile of coal The story of the state's 10-billionth ton
All Energy

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.