You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Old and foul-mouthed
The GOAT Blog

Old and foul-mouthed

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Cally Carswell | Jun 13, 2012 06:00 AM

I've done a few stories on air pollution in the last year, and many a source has told me this: When it comes to pollution, all fossil fuel power plants are not created equal. It's a principle enshrined in the Clean Air Act. Power plants that began generating electricity before 1978 are grandfathered into the act's pollution control regulations -- unless they undergo substantial upgrades, they don't have to outfit themselves with the emission-cutting equipment that the Environmental Protection Agency requires new facilities to have. It doesn't take much of a stretch of the imagination to predict the result: Older power plants pollute more than newer ones. 

In a new report, the Government Accountability Office quantified the disparity, and the specifics are pretty interesting. Among fossil fuel power plants -- those burning coal, natural gas or oil -- older units generate 45 percent of the electricity. Yet those same plants spew out 75 percent of sulfur dioxide emissions, 64 percent of emissions of nitrogen oxides, and 54 percent of carbon dioxide emissions.

A couple of charts tell the story a different way. 

GAO emissions by decade

 

GAO SO NOX by decade

 

Pretty striking, eh? There are a few explanations for why newer power plants -- and especially the newest -- emit so much less sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. One is that in the 2000s, many more new natural gas plants came online than coal plants. They don't emit sulfur dioxide -- which can aggravate asthma and other respiratory ailments; emit far less nitrogen oxides, a contributor to ozone; and release about half as much carbon dioxide. Before the 1990s, almost all new power plants to come online were coal-fired, and in the 1990s the split between gas and coal was about even. 

Another reason for the difference is the Clean Air Act. New coal fired power plants are required to install what's called "best available control technology" to curb emissions of pollutants like sulfur dioxide. What's considered the best available technology changes and improves over time. For instance, these days new coal plants are outfitted with scrubbers that can eliminate more than 90 percent of sulfur dioxide emissions. Sixty-three percent of the coal-fired power plants built after 1978 use this technology, while only 26 percent of those built before then do. 

As for carbon dioxide, aside from being more efficient at converting coal into electricity, new coal plants aren't much better than old because, as we reported on this blog recently, technology to capture carbon emissions is still in its infancy. 

So, the good news: We've gotten a lot better at generating cleaner power, even from fossil fuels. The bad news: Those old, dirty power plants are still an important part of our energy mix -- and, for the most part, they aren't getting any cleaner. 

Cally Carswell is HCN's assistant editor. 

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  2. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  3. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  4. Save our gauges | Important USGS stream gauges imperiled by austerit...
  5. Rants from the hill: Trapping the bees | What to do when 50,000 honeybees hive up inside th...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  3. How technology detected a huge mine landslide before it happened | Employees at a Kennecott copper mine outside Salt ...
  4. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  5. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
More from Climate & Pollution
Winter: an encore edition The author celebrates the (temporary) return of winter in Montana
Mixed messages on methane And why you shouldn't make too much of any of them -- yet
Mapping your way to better health California is a test-ground for the new field of Geomedicine
All Climate & Pollution

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.