You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Haze be gone
The GOAT Blog

Haze be gone

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Cally Carswell | Aug 10, 2011 05:00 AM

When I started researching regional haze rules a few months back, a source warned me that I was wading into the Clean Air Act's wonkiest, most technically complicated depths. I remember her asking me something like: "Are you sure you want to go there?" Which is to say, you'd be forgiven if you paid little attention to regional haze. Eyes tend to glaze over at mention of the term.

But here's why you should care about haze rules: They're poised to make a major dent in the air pollutants spewed from the West's oldest, dirtiest coal-fired power plants. Facing huge costs to bring it into compliance with haze regulation, the Boardman power plant in Oregon decided to close in 2020, 20 years ahead of schedule. The Navajo Generating Station could suffer a similar fate. And last week, after rejecting the state of New Mexico's plan for clearing the haze caused by emissions from the San Juan Generating Station, the Environmental Protection Agency issued the final version of its own plan for the coal plant, which requires it to install better pollution controls that reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by a whopping 80 percent.

The goal of the haze rules is to restore air quality in national parks and wilderness areas, or Class 1 areas in regulatory jargon. The San Juan Generating Station is to thank for most of the air pollution that shrouds Mesa Verde. And the pollutants falling under haze regulation also impact public health, causing respiratory ailments and asthma, for example. According to the Summit County Citizens Voice, the San Juan Generating Station and the Four Corners Power Plant nearby are collectively responsible "for at least two-thirds of total nitrogen oxide pollution in San Juan County ... and a quarter of all nitrogen oxide emissions statewide in New Mexico. The American Lung Association has given San Juan County an “F” grade for ozone pollution due to the number of days each year that it surpasses levels of ozone concentrations that the ALA considers unhealthy."

Environmentalists are praising the EPA's crackdown on the generating station, and hoping it's a sign of more tough rules to come. As the Citizens Voice reports: "There are decades-old plants with major pollution problems in more than 40 other states that will face similar decisions on pollution upgrades in the coming year or two."

Cally Carswell is HCN's assistant editor.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Hard choices for an uncertain future | After seeing a talk by climate activist Tim DeChri...
  2. Two blocks from the Mexican border | The author watches migrants run across the border ...
  3. New Mexico on fire | From wildfire to starving wildlife, the effects of...
  4. The power grid may determine whether we can kick our carbon habit | How the huge and fragile network of wires intertwi...
  5. Wild, free and out of control | Calling out an NBC-TV program for romanticizing wi...
  1. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  2. The power grid may determine whether we can kick our carbon habit | How the huge and fragile network of wires intertwi...
  3. The latest: Channel Island foxes rebound | A massive restoration effort has helped the tiny f...
  4. Is the Violence Against Women Act a chance for tribes to reinforce their sovereignty? | A new provision lets tribes prosecute non-tribal m...
  5. Two blocks from the Mexican border | The author watches migrants run across the border ...
More from Climate & Pollution
What's eating the snowpack? Researchers untangle the causes of unusual snowpack declines throughout the Rockies
Arctic ship logs help scientists reconstruct climatic history Sailors' journals detailing the weather of voyages past could improve the accuracy of climate models' projections of the future.
Hard choices for an uncertain future After seeing a talk by climate activist Tim DeChristopher, the author wonders: which energy source is the lesser of many evils?
All Climate & Pollution

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.