You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Friday News Roundup: Bison and borders
The GOAT Blog

Friday News Roundup: Bison and borders

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Kimberly Hirai | Sep 23, 2011 05:00 AM

A final answer to where wild bison can roam won't surface until Montana develops a statewide conservation strategy for the mighty rangeland beasts. In the meantime, bison need a temporary home, and the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks is discussing where to put them. They say that may be Fort Belknap and Fort Peck Indian Reservations in Montana.

Although the herd up for placement has tested negative multiple times for brucellosis, deciding on a place it will settle for the next few years is still contentious. Montana legislators still worry about possible transmission of brucellosis to cattle and ranchers worry about damage to agricultural fields should the bison escape their interim homes.

Bison

Last week, Fish, Wildlife and Parks released an environmental assessment evaluating a plan to move about 150 disease-free bison (originally from Yellowstone National Park, now being held in quarantine and on Ted Turner's ranch) to Fort Belknap and Fort Peck and to the Spotted Dog and Marias River state wildlife management areas. The measure comes pending a statewide conservation strategy to be developed by 2015 that would identify permanent locations for the brucellosis-free mammals.

“Wild bison should be an integral part of America’s future, not just a relic of our past,” said Jonathan Proctor, Defenders of Wildlife’s Rocky Mountain representative. High Country News editor Sarah Gilman first reported on recent efforts to expand where Yellowstone bison could roam in May. But even without threat of brucellosis, approving a management plan remains difficult. The assessment's proposal of where to put the animals drew the ire of Montana legislators, including Sen. Gene Vuckovich. Vuckovich said the management plan developed for the Spotted Dog wildlife management area did not include bison, arguing their introduction “would conflict with deer, elk and antelope goals identified in that (management) plan” and that bison should have also been included in the purchase agreement for the property.

Though no startup costs are associated with holding bison on tribal lands, wildlife management areas would require additional boundary fencing and gates. Cost estimates for the relocation and containment structures were revised this week from more than $2.3 million to less than $1 million.

The public comment period for the assessment will close on Oct. 19. Wildlife commissioners could vote on the issue Nov. 13.

Border signWhile bison may expand their borders, one Congressional representative wants to better protect the United States'. Utah Republican Rep. Rob Bishop proposed H.R. 1505, a bill that would give the Department of Homeland Security greater authority in public lands within 100 miles of the U.S. border. "The border will never be secure against illegal entry and drug smuggling as long as portions of the border are wide open," he said in a statement Sept. 13 reported by Energy & Environment News (subscription required)

The National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act would waive 36 environmental laws on patrolled borderlands, including the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act. and the Clean Air Act. It would allow the department to construct fences and roads, conduct vehicle patrols and set up monitoring equipment on those lands. Federal agents are currently restricted to where they can patrol by car on federally designated wilderness, such as dirt roads. They also have to request permission from public land managers to establish operations bases or set up surveillance.

But those in opposition say the measure gives a single agency overreaching authority. Democratic Sen. Jon Tester described the measure as a "federal land grab at its worst." Opponents fear additional access will damage both natural and cultural resources, though supporters say public safety and national security should supersede other principles.

Bishop expects a markup session of the bill sometime before the end of this year.

Kimberly Hirai is an intern at High Country News.

Image courtesy Flickr user Katie & Ian and ChuckHolton.

 

Lynne Gonzales
Lynne Gonzales Subscriber
Sep 23, 2011 11:43 AM
Does this not sound like the immigration debate????

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  2. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  3. (Still) getting the lead out | When will hunters stop poisoning condors with ammu...
  4. Rants from the hill: Trapping the bees | What to do when 50,000 honeybees hive up inside th...
  5. What's killing bees? | Apparently everything, according to a new federal ...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. Sacrificial Land: Will renewable energy devour the Mojave Desert? | An unlikely group of activists is championing a ne...
  3. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  4. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
  5. Trappers catch a lot more than wolves | Mountain lions, eagles, bobcats, geese and domesti...
More from Politics & Policy
Save our gauges Important USGS stream gauges imperiled by austerity
The other Cannabis legalization story Is victory finally within reach for hemp growers?
Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thrive in the Northwest?
All Politics & Policy

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.