You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   "A deeply troubled idea from the start"
The GOAT Blog

"A deeply troubled idea from the start"

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Cally Carswell | Nov 09, 2009 04:29 PM

In 2000, when the federal government shelled out $101 million to buy what’s now the Valles Caldera National Preserve, it made one thing clear: The government wouldn’t be the preserve’s cash cow forever. But nine years later, the preserve isn't close to weaning itself off federal funding, according to a recent report by the Government Accountability Office.

Valles Caldera started as an experiment in public lands management. The 89,000-acre ranch was purchased for preservation, but would be managed as a working ranch by a for-profit government corporation called the Valles Caldera Trust. By 2015, the feds expected the trust to be able to support itself financially, a goal the GAO now says is out of reach:

[The Trust] is at least 5 years behind the schedule it set for itself in 2004. According to Trust officials, a number of factors—including high turnover among Board members and key staff and cultural and natural resources and infrastructure that were not as healthy or robust as originally believed—have delayed its progress.

... Specifically, the Trust lacked a strategic plan and annual performance plans, and it had not systematically monitored or reported on its progress ... The Trust’s financial management has also been weak. Consequently, it has been difficult for Congress and the public to understand the Trust’s goals and objectives, annual plans and performance, or progress.

... [B]ecoming financially self-sustaining, particularly by the end of fiscal year 2015 when federal appropriations are due to expire, is the Trust's biggest challenge.

 

Public enthusiasm for the Valles Caldera experiment was initially high, but has since tanked. Conservationists are calling for the trust to be dissolved, pushing for the preserve to be managed by the National Park Service instead. To these critics, the GAO's findings likely come as no surprise. "We worked hard in 2000 to get the Valles Caldera in public hands," Tom Ribe, of watchdog group Caldera Action, told Writers on the Range contributor Mike Castinado this fall. "But [the trust] was a deeply troubled idea from the start, and we gave up on it entirely sometime in 2007."

Even before that, management of the preserve had become controversial. As HCN reported in 2005, the public was feeling increasingly locked out of a management process that was once inclusive and transparent. Access to the land itself was no better: "[F]ive years after the preserve's creation, the public has unrestricted access to just two short hiking and ski trails. Hunting is tightly restricted, and even fishing access is determined by a lottery held three times a year." Now, reports Castinado, access isn't only controlled, it's expensive: "You have to pay to play in the preserve or be politically connected to get in."

Valles Caldera National Preserve
Marie Rodriguez
Marie Rodriguez
Nov 10, 2009 04:14 PM
I am the Natural Resource Coordinator for the Valles Caldera National Preserve. While I won't pretend that our experiment in public land management is perfect or meeting everyone's expectations I would like to share some lesser known facts about what has taken place on the Preserve since Federal Acquisition in 2000. Number 1 - "Adaptive Management" towards this lofty ideal, the trust has established 41 permenant ecological monitoring sites and a series of riparian and upland exclosures to systematically measure ecological condition. And we do (measure that is) - twice annually every site is measured under the direction of the Joranada Experimental Range Station. Trust staff, volunteeers and members of the Sierra Club actually perform the measurements. We have also established 600 permenant forest plots as part of a stratified inventory. One plot for every 100 acres of forest type stratified by biophysical setting to support the development of a preserve-wide plan for forest restoration. The surrounding National Park Service Land and National Forest Service Land does not have an area wide inventory of their landscapes and they have had over a century head start!

We have flumes established in every perennial reach of stream, we have water quality instrumentation measuring 24/7 during the frost free season. We are quantifying the hydrologic and carbon cycles as well as the changing climate of the preserve. We have radio collars on our elk, turkeys and coyotes. We have identified new insect species never before discovered. It seems our greatest sin is in establishing the neccessary foundation of knowledge about this unique landscape BEFORE we make long term decisions regarding how best to manage it.

It may also interest people to know we have restored over 1000 acres of wetlands just by addressing deferred maintenance needs of our roads, we have measurably improved the functioning condition of our streams in repeated inventories as well as vegetative cover, and diversity. We have reduced cattle numbers from 5000 under private ownership to an average 500 and graze in partnership with New Mexico State University and local tribes and in a break even program that provides research and support to local communities.

Access is restricted because we have no infrastructure such as a visitor center parking or trail heads which provide access while protecting our resources. We are open 7 days/ week during the summer, elk hunting is a premier experience for a 25 dollar lottery ticket (the lottery is managed by the Statge Game and Fish Deprtment). We are currently considering alternatives for a comprehensive program to expand access while proptecting and preserving resources - to get involved visit our website, www.vallescaldera.gov and select mailing list from the top-left corner.

Again we are more focused on developing the BEST strategy for stewardship rather than the quickest, we hope you join us!
Valles Caldera
Rich Winkler
Rich Winkler
Nov 16, 2009 02:16 PM
I was glad to fish in the Caldera without the mass of people a National Park would bring to the area. I was happy to put in by lottery so that the fishing experience would be one that I will remember without the commercial landscape of the Park service.
open access to VCNP
daniel barboa
daniel barboa
Dec 01, 2009 03:39 PM
I have had the fortune of spending time in the VCNP on several occaions. I am neither wealthy nor politically connected. The preserve offers such a unique opportunity for the public, the entire public, that to change the preserve drastically would be to everyone's detriment.

The preserve allows equal opportunity for anyone to apply for hunting, anyone to apply to fish, hike, ski, etc. The preserve has even made this easier for some activities.

I've seen many articles suggesting the preserve needs to have more access for the 'average' outdoors person. This is not an 'average' place, and anyone who's been there would understand why there are more restrictions and fees associated with enjoying the preserve.

I understand that the original intent for the preserve to be self-sufficient has not yet been realized. However, the idea of building restaurants, RV parks, and other public amenities (as suggested in an alarming article) is simply ridiculous. The local population cannot sustain this for the 10 months of the year that would not be peak tourism. These amenities are located in the nearest towns of Los Alamos, Jemez Springs, and La Cueva. I am sure that the residents of these towns welcome the income these facilities bring in.

Also, how would this sort of development impact the ecology of the preserve? Take a drive along the Pecos River, to the confluence with the Mora. During the summer, the RV park is full with campers. Although this is great in terms of the fees required to camp, it also introduces litter, noise, erosion, and general habitat degradation in and around the riparian system. All of these have already happened in the Jemez Mountains that surround the preserve, by 'average' citizens.

I always have been and will remain willing to spend a little extra money in order to spend time in the VCNP.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  2. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  3. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  4. Save our gauges | Important USGS stream gauges imperiled by austerit...
  5. Rants from the hill: Trapping the bees | What to do when 50,000 honeybees hive up inside th...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  3. How technology detected a huge mine landslide before it happened | Employees at a Kennecott copper mine outside Salt ...
  4. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  5. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
More from Politics & Policy
Once there was an effective governor and a middle ground Remembering former Oregon Gov. Tom McCall, a centrist who got good things done.
Save our gauges Important USGS stream gauges imperiled by austerity
The other Cannabis legalization story Is victory finally within reach for hemp growers?
All Politics & Policy

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.