You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Could the Tennessee Valley Authority put Colorado coal mines out of business?
The GOAT Blog

Could the Tennessee Valley Authority put Colorado coal mines out of business?

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Emily Guerin | Dec 10, 2013 05:00 AM

The coal train was one of the first things I noticed when I moved to Paonia, Colo., the hometown of High Country News. When it chugged through town, whistle blasting, my bedroom windows rattled like teeth in the cold. If I was on the phone, I would tell the person on the other line to hold on until it passed. I remember another recent transplant explaining her similar experience on our community Facebook page and asking the crowd if she would ever get used to the whistle blowing in the middle of the night. Yes, she was told, but just remember: that trainload of coal pays the bills for many people here in the valley.

Paonia orchard coal mine
Paonia, Colorado Orchards in the foreground, abandoned coal mine scar up high on the mesa. Photograph by Emily Guerin.

Soon there may be fewer trains. One of our local coal mines (there are three in the valley) just laid off most of its nearly 300 miners after a fire and an underground roof collapse forced the company to abandon its longwall, a massive piece of equipment that can cost $50 million. Now, workers at another local mine are worried they could lose their jobs, too, if the Tennessee Valley Authority, the largest public power company in the country, doesn’t renew its coal contract, which expires at the end of the year.

TVA has been buying Colorado coal since the early 1990s, when the first President Bush amended the Clean Air Act to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions from power plants. To meet the new regulations, Eastern utilities like TVA, which formerly got a lot of its coal from the Southeast, began substituting with Western coal, which is generally less sulfuric.

But now, utilities around the country are trying to figure out whether it makes sense to continue using coal when natural gas is so cheap and when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is likely to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants, making it more expensive to burn coal. For TVA, it seems like the answer is no: in 2011, the utility announced it would close 18 of its 59 coal-fired units as part of a court settlement for Clean Air Act violations. A few weeks ago, TVA added another eight units to that list.

“Coal in the 1970s was as much as 70 percent of our generation mix and we’re now at about 40 percent,” says TVA spokesman Duncan Mansfield. Under a new long-term plan for the utility, coal’s contribution will drop to 20 percent.

coal SE
Coal-fired electricity is declining in the Southeastern United States. Courtesy Energy Information Administration.

The Southeast, more than any other region in the country, has begun to shift away from coal, according to the federal Energy Information Administration. The reasons being: low gas prices, lots of efficient gas-fired generators, and, most importantly for Colorado, the high costs of importing all that low-sulfur Western coal.

“Coming out of the mountains is expensive,” says Bob Burnham, an independent Denver-based coal industry analyst. Mines in the Indiana Basin, which includes parts of Indiana, Kentucky and Illinois, are much closer to Southeastern power plants. Even Powder River Basin coal from Montana and Wyoming has an advantage over most Colorado mines: it doesn’t have to cross the Continental Divide.

As TVA cuts its coal consumption, it will cut especially deeply from its Colorado suppliers, says Mansfield. That’s especially bad news for Paonia, whose three local coal mines predominantly sell to TVA.

coal mine paonia
Driving beneath a coal mine outside Paonia, Colorado. Photograph by Andrew Cullen.

It’s a hard time for mine operators to shop for a new coal contract. “We’re in an over supply situation in the U.S.,” Burnham says. “The utilities know there’s somebody out there who can sell them the coal. The mining companies are scrambling to get their share of the business. And there’s no guarantee that they will get it.”

It’s an uncertain future not only for the miners here, but for all of us who benefit from the stores and services that those high-paying jobs support. The changes only underscore how much even isolated rural towns are impacted by macroeconomic forces and decisions made far away.

Emily Guerin is a correspondent at High Country News. She tweets @guerinemily.

Candyce Wither
Candyce Wither
Dec 10, 2013 07:26 PM
I empathize with the inevitable layoffs but I worry about global warming more by a large factor. Let's get a direct tax on carbon and actually try to save the our planet's environment. Put our values in the right place.
James Bowen
James Bowen
Dec 11, 2013 10:21 AM
Mercury from burning coal is an immediate threat to the health of Americans and the power companies should be stopped from emitting that from their power plants.
Tanner Morley
Tanner Morley
Dec 15, 2013 09:58 PM
I absolutely agree that global warming is one of the most serious issues facing humanity today. What irks me most about the coal fight is that the more we press the issue here in the U.S., the worse we make the issue as a whole. By shutting down coal burning plants here, we are just adding coal to the international market. Currently, and for the forseeable future, China is the number one consumer of the coal in this global market place. If you think our U.S. coal power plants are terrible polluter, don't look up statistics about Chinese plants. Scrubber technology that is mandated in the U.S. to remove sulfur dioxide, mercury, and other truly harmful pollutants is not-so-conspicuously missing. So, while I understand the argument for super tight regulation, it seems terribly short sighted. We do live in a singular biosphere after all, not just us and them.
Deb Dedon
Deb Dedon Subscriber
Dec 18, 2013 03:13 PM
And those prevailing westerly winds blow China's coal-fired pollutants out to sea, and what the Pacific doesn't absorb, blows here.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. Why I am a Tea Party member |
  3. The privatization of public campground management | All the info you need to decide whether you love o...
  4. Efficiency lessons from Germany |
  5. The Latest: Interior commits to restoring bison on select lands | The “odd ungulate out” gets a tentative win.
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. A graceful gazelle becomes a pest | Inrroducing an African gazelle called the oryx for...
  3. What's killing the Yukon's salmon? | An ecological mystery in Alaska has scientists and...
  4. Plains sense | Ten years after Frank and Deborah Popper first pro...
  5. North Dakota wrestles with radioactive oilfield waste | Regulators look at raising the limit for radiation...
More from Energy
On booms and their remains A North Dakota photographer returns home to examine changes to the landscape.
Efficiency lessons from Germany
The Latest: Mining battle update at Utah’s Tavaputs Plateau State supreme court gives green light to tar sands permits.
All Energy
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone