You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Compromise in the Wyoming Range
The GOAT Blog

Compromise in the Wyoming Range

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Emilene Ostlind | Dec 14, 2010 10:40 AM

Three days after my recent story about a proposed energy development in the Wyoming Range's Noble Basin rolled off the presses, the Forest Service released their much-anticipated draft environmental impact statement for the project. The Forest Service's "preferred alternative" would let Plains Exploration and Production (or PXP) develop the necessary roads and infrastructure to drill all of the wells the company proposed -- 136 of them from 17 well pads -- with only a few restrictions, such as no drilling during the winter, no development within 500 feet of streams, and extra emissions controls to protect air quality.

Even Governor Dave Freudenthal, D-Wyo., has called for a "very high bar" to protect habitat and environmental resources in the Noble Basin. But critics of the project say the Forest Service's draft EIS set the bar disappointingly low. "No drilling should happen here no matter what," says Heather Mathews, who owns a piece of property in the Hoback Ranches, a few miles away from the proposed drilling site.  "This area needs to be protected forever." Dan Smitherman, spokesman for Citizens for the Wyoming Range, a group that wants to keep energy development out of the Noble Basin, says the agency's preferred alternative "didn't offer anything to wildlife. It's essentially what PXP wants. It's the project with a few tweaks."

But then, the day after the Forest Service released the document, a new piece of information landed in the mix.  Two Wyoming organizations -- Wyoming Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife and Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association -- announced that they had signed an agreement with PXP. The agreement places much stricter restrictions on the development than the Forest Service proposed, including moving two wells away from the Hoback River. It also includes a promise from PXP to retire more than 28,000 acres of leases deep inside the Wyoming Range without monetary compensation. And under the agreement, PXP would contribute $4 million to mitigate impacts to wildlife from the development, plus an additional $2 million to pay for air and water quality monitoring, a moose study, and projects to benefit nearby communities. In return, the sportsmen's groups promised to support development of the 136 wells in the public review process and during any potential litigation.

An editorial in the Casper Star Tribune hailed the deal as a "landmark agreement" that will "significantly" contain drilling in the Wyoming Range.

Gary Amerine is vice president of the Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association. He's been working to protect the Wyoming Range since the late Senator Craig Thomas, R-Wyo., began drafting the Wyoming Range Legacy Act about five years ago. Amerine acknowledges that some people who use these mountains for hunting and recreation will be impacted by the development, but adds, "Thank goodness I sat down with (PXP). If we hadn't been involved, (they) would still hold the 28,000 acres, there would be no mitigation fund, and no restrictions that the agreement has on it. It could be a lot worse." Governor Freudenthal issued a statement saying he is "pleased" with the way the agreement addressed his concerns with the development.  Hoback River in the Wyoming Range

But Heather Mathews was shocked to learn about the plan. "As much as I appreciate them giving money, it's still roads, it's still drilling, it's still the impact," she says. "It's still going to threaten the wildlife. It's still going to threaten the air and water quality." And the proposed compromise still lets PXP build a road right through the bear hole, a tree-covered slope prized by local hunters.

Both Mathews and Smitherman point to mitigation funds that have failed to protect wildlife from energy development elsewhere in Sublette County, Wyo. "We have a track record with wildlife mitigation funds," Smitherman says. "The Pinedale Anticline wildlife fund was $22 million and the mule deer still went down 60 percent."

He also questions the implication that the Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association, of which he is a member, endorses the compromise, saying it was "negotiated in a back room. There was no public input."

"Both the DEIS and the agreement end with same results," he says. "They end with turning this area into an industrial wasteland."

For the agreement between the sportsmen's groups and PXP to become official, it must go through the Forest Service's environmental review, which includes analyzing the impacts of the plan, inviting public input and publishing a formal record of decision that authorizes how the development can proceed. Public comments on the natural gas development can be submitted in writing to:

Bridger-Teton National Forest

Jacqueline A. Buchanan

P.O. Box 1888

Jackson, WY 83001

Comments may also be submitted by email with the subject line “Eagle Prospect and Noble Basin MDP DEIS.” Comments can be included either in the body of the message or attached as plain text (.txt), rich text (.rtf), or Word (.doc) and sent to:

comments-intermtn-bridger-teton-big-piney@fs.fed.us

Comments may be submitted through March 10, 2011.

Photo: The Hoback River flows through the Wyoming Range, by the author.

Emilene Ostlind is a High Country News editorial intern.

PXP leases in Wyoming Range
Andy
Andy
Dec 16, 2010 02:10 PM
Would anything stop the Forest Service from selling new leases on the 28,000 acres in the Wyoming Range once PXP's leasees run out? Given that someone like Sarah Palin were president or running Interior.
The Legacy Act
Emilene Ostlind
Emilene Ostlind
Dec 16, 2010 04:53 PM
Hi Andy, Good question. There is special legislation in place to prevent leases from being resold. The 2009 Wyoming Range Legacy Act created a 1.2 million acre withdrawal area in the mountains where no new leases can be sold, and when a lease holder donates a lease for conservation in the withdrawal area, the BLM will cancel the lease and not re-sell it. So if PXP hands over those 28,000 acres worth of leases, they will be permanently protected from development.
Seriously?
Wyo Local
Wyo Local
Feb 02, 2011 09:05 PM
I'm sorry, but if you live in Hoback Ranches - in the same ecologically sensitive area but in a HUGE sprawling rural residential development - your opinion on roads and impacts is pretty laughable to me.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. Why I am a Tea Party member |
  3. The privatization of public campground management | All the info you need to decide whether you love o...
  4. Efficiency lessons from Germany |
  5. The Latest: Interior commits to restoring bison on select lands | The “odd ungulate out” gets a tentative win.
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. A graceful gazelle becomes a pest | Inrroducing an African gazelle called the oryx for...
  3. What's killing the Yukon's salmon? | An ecological mystery in Alaska has scientists and...
  4. Plains sense | Ten years after Frank and Deborah Popper first pro...
  5. North Dakota wrestles with radioactive oilfield waste | Regulators look at raising the limit for radiation...
More from Energy
On booms and their remains A North Dakota photographer returns home to examine changes to the landscape.
Efficiency lessons from Germany
The Latest: Mining battle update at Utah’s Tavaputs Plateau State supreme court gives green light to tar sands permits.
All Energy
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone