Personal tools
You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Commitment issues
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
 
The GOAT Blog

Commitment issues

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Arla Shephard | Nov 05, 2009 02:10 PM

Today, for the first time in 15 years, leaders from the United States' 564 federally recognized Indian tribes met with political leaders in DC to discuss the problems that blight their communities: lack of adequate health care, lack of adequate employment, lack of, well, a lot of things.

The day-long summit began with opening remarks from President Barack Obama, who promised to make good on some of his campaign commitments: 

Without real communication and consultation, we're stuck, year after year, with policies that don't work on issues specific to you and on broader issues that affect all of us. And you deserve to have a voice in both.

I know that you may be skeptical that this time will be any different. You have every right to be, and nobody would have blamed you if you didn't come today. But you did. And I know what an extraordinary leap of faith that is on your part.

The President continued with a laundry list of policies and appointments he's made to prove that, this time, the tumultuous relationship between the First Nations and the federal government will smooth out a little bit: Huge chunks of the federal stimulus package have gone to obtaining more jobs on reservations, improving educational opportunities and fighting domestic violence in Indian Country. In 90 days, Obama expects every Cabinet member to give him a detailed plan on how they're going to implement President Bill Clinton's 1994 executive order to establish regular communication between the tribal and federal governments.

Most definitely, the conference is a positive step in the right direction. But does it amount to anything more than a promise ring?

Tribal leaders have been careful not to get their expectations too high, as Obama himself noted, but some tribes are taking the opportunity to ask for even more of a commitment from the federal government. In a letter on behalf of the Timbisha Shoshone of the Western Shoshone Nation, Chairman Joe Kennedy urged Obama to sign the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigineous Peoples:

Mr. President, we write this in recognition of what we believe is your sincere commitment to uphold and strengthen the relationships with the *US government* and *American Indian Nations.* In keeping with your invitation to meet leaders of the *Nations and Pueblos of Indigenous Peoples of North America* which brings us to Washington DC, we offer our greetings to you and extend our hands in the spirit of a renewed and re-visioned expression of this relationship. A critical part of this relationship is recognizing that the time has come to break the chains from centuries of racism, colonization and ongoing oppression across North America. This can begin to be accomplished by the US adopting the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

 Only time will tell how much of a commitment the government will really make to tribes,  Forrest Cuch, executive director of the Utah Division of Indian Affairs and a member of the Ute Tribe, told The Salt Lake Tribune.

"It's an outstanding gesture and it certainly breaks the ice as far as demonstrating a commitment to earnest relations with Indian tribes," Cuch said. "[But] sometimes, government leaders will go a little bit further with some initiatives but not really carry them out."

Non-Natives reporting the Native stories
Danielle
Danielle
Nov 07, 2009 08:24 PM
With so many fine Native American reporters, why are you using non-Natives to tell the Native story? A one time article, especially on tight deadline might be justified, but this writer consistently blogs Native issues. Surely there are place-based Native Americans willing and able to narrate stories they have the best grasp of. Knowing how many good Native reporters there are, it even appears that perhaps they're not writing for you because of your demand for a certain slant that's meets your readership's expectations, but isn't accurate. Native Americans are not just entertainment. If you want the cachet that comes with Native reporting, use Native reporters. That way, when you've got it wrong, they'll tell you it's wrong. Whether or not Ms. Shepherd has a sliver of Native ancestry, she doesn't speak for Indian Country, as her commentary seems to do.
Native American writing about themselves
Mathew J Kanjirath
Mathew J Kanjirath
Nov 11, 2009 02:47 PM
In communication, its important to write and speak to the audience that needs to hear and not to those that want to speak.

Having a fine American reporter is a good thing but that should not be the selection criteria.
Native reporters
Jodi Peterson
Jodi Peterson
Nov 12, 2009 08:43 AM
Thanks for the comments, Danielle and Mathew. Have you seen the posts by Native reporters Mark Trahant and Rob Capriccioso, in our Grange blog? We're committed to having diverse voices in HCN, and we work with other Native writers as well. If you have particular reporters you'd like to suggest to us, please drop us a line at editor AT hcn.org. Thanks again for your interest in HCN.
 

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Fearful of Agenda 21, an alleged U.N. plot, activists derail land-use planning | A two-year planning process in La Plata County, Co...
  2. Billboard corporations use money and influence to override your vote | In Salt Lake City and other Western communities, b...
  3. The logging town of Darrington, Wash., fights to save a fire lookout | A lawsuit raises questions about how far environme...
  4. Feeding the deer | A rural Californian doesn't apologize for feeding ...
  5. Residents of Montana's High Plains are angry - but not at the real threats | Though climate change and the economy are the issu...
  1. Fearful of Agenda 21, an alleged U.N. plot, activists derail land-use planning | A two-year planning process in La Plata County, Co...
  2. Billboard corporations use money and influence to override your vote | In Salt Lake City and other Western communities, b...
  3. The logging town of Darrington, Wash., fights to save a fire lookout | A lawsuit raises questions about how far environme...
  4. Residents of Montana's High Plains are angry - but not at the real threats | Though climate change and the economy are the issu...
  5. Picking ranchers' brains, from Colorado to Mongolia | Colorado State University professor Maria Fernande...
More from Politics & Policy
Martinez making her mark Love her or hate her, the N.M. guv is reshaping the state's political landscape
The postal service is slipping away A great nation needs a great postal system -- even if it doesn't quite pay for itself
Montana court defends law defying Citizens United As elections of state judges become increasingly contentious, the Montana Supreme Court defends the state's Corrupt Practices Act against the Citizens United decision.
All Politics & Policy

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2012 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

- The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

- An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis