You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Claws out for big cat protection
The GOAT Blog

Claws out for big cat protection

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
arib | Sep 25, 2009 09:07 AM

Macho B's death, contentious and untimely, could also be criminal. 

The capture, collaring and euthanization of America’s last known wild jaguar in March was illegal, according to the Center for Biological Diversity, who brought a lawsuit against Arizona Game and Fish Department yesterday. The Center asserts that AZ Game and Fish did not have the required permits to allow the capture of endangered jaguars, and seeks to prevent the state agency from any other similar captures until it gets all the necessary permits.

This lawsuit is separate from a criminal investigation of Macho B’s treatment that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service undertook in April, which will look into "all aspects of the incident." Tucson congressman Raul Grijalva, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Defenders of Wildlife pushed for a federal investigation after concerns were raised regarding whether Macho B's capture was intentional or not, reported the Arizona Daily Star, which has been following the issue.

“We hope that the Fish and Wildlife Service will seek accountability and justice for the loss of the last known jaguar in United States,” said Michael Robinson of the Center. “Our suit is about preventing future harm to jaguars in the United States,” according to the press release.

While protection and appropriate treatment of the iconic feline is admirable and important, it's unfortunate that this comes after the killing of the last known wild one, which ultimately may have been unnecessary: Was our last wild jaguar euthanized by mistake?



Overkill
Paul Correa
Paul Correa
Oct 02, 2009 08:51 PM
Both the criminal prosecution and the Center's lawsuit are misguided. The AGFD biologists are passionate about all wildlife and did not intentionally kill the cat, but they are being villainized. These biologists aren't getting rich from their work. The Center, on the other hand, has capitalized for some time on images of the jaguar(s) to raise funds and promote its extreme positions. The current suit is seeking an injunction against a past harm. It should be dismissed. Criminal charges are not warranted, either. Not by a long shot. Several years ago there was a rare ESA criminal prosecution against a member of the Klump ranching family and his friend who pursued jaguars into Mexico. The evidence room held two stuffed jaguars and several ocelots (all poorly sewn, since no legit taxidermist would touch them). Those guys deserved to be prosecuted -- a far cry from the hard-working state biologists!
 
Also, I'm not sure it is accurate to call this the "last" known wild jaguar. The area in Southern Arizona (which I think I know pretty well from working and hunting out there for decades) is considered the northernmost range of these cats, has been historically occupied by them, and there is no reason to think that a dispersing young male can not occupy it again. Anectdotally, there are people around Patagonia and Sasabe (small towns in the region) who believe there have been, and still are, more than one jaguar in the region. I recently spoke with an opal miner who works a small claim in the Atascosa Mountains who claimed to have seen a jaguar.
JAGUARS
Larry Audsley
Larry Audsley
Dec 08, 2009 11:08 PM
Well said, Mr. Correa. AGFD and the other volunteers were doing everything they could to help the jaguar as a species. It was unfortunate that the old jaguar died, but it was near the end of its life span anyway. The non-profits who filed the lawsuit are indeed seeking a fundraising opportunity and political theater.
Macho B
Harley G. Shaw
Harley G. Shaw
Dec 09, 2009 06:15 AM
I agree with Paul Correa's assessment of the situation. Macho B was certainly not Arizona's "last jaguar." His death was unfortunate, but face it, he was a very old cat.
The careers of some very fine biologists have been damaged by a frivolous lawsuit and irresponsible media hype.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  2. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  3. (Still) getting the lead out | When will hunters stop poisoning condors with ammu...
  4. Rants from the hill: Trapping the bees | What to do when 50,000 honeybees hive up inside th...
  5. What's killing bees? | Apparently everything, according to a new federal ...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. Sacrificial Land: Will renewable energy devour the Mojave Desert? | An unlikely group of activists is championing a ne...
  3. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  4. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
  5. Trappers catch a lot more than wolves | Mountain lions, eagles, bobcats, geese and domesti...
More from Flora & Fauna
It's Endangered Species Day! 40 years on and the ESA continues to have growing pains
In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and trappers to reduce wolf populations, a Montana couple is dedicated to their hunt.
The danger of too much screentime, in and out of the woods Stewardship demands boots on the ground, but will the next generation rise to the challenge?
All Flora & Fauna

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.