You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Cheap grass
The GOAT Blog

Cheap grass

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Cally Carswell | Jun 10, 2010 04:51 PM

Grazing fees aren’t exactly bringing home the bacon … er, beef … for the feds. As we pointed out earlier this year, in the past 40-plus years the fee to graze a cow and calf on public land has gone up a measly 12 cents: from $1.23 to $1.35.

That increase hasn’t even come close to keeping pace with inflation and, not surprisingly, the paltry fee is doing little to fill federal coffers. According to a 2005 Government Accountability Office report, grazing fees in 2004 added up to just one-sixth of the amount spent managing grazing on public land. (Then again, perhaps we should just be thankful that the fee in 2010 isn't cheaper than the year before.)

Now, a coalition of environmental groups represented by the Center for Biological Diversity are suing the departments of Interior and Agriculture to get them to up the ante, calling the federal grazing program "as fiscally irresponsible as it is ecologically harmful." It's a demand they've been making for a long time. In 2005 the groups petitioned the agencies to embark on a rulemaking process to "establish a fair and just fee for livestock grazing on certain federal lands" in the West. The petition has, so far, elicited no response; the new lawsuit is intended to compel one.

In another legal battle over grazing, this one focused on its environmental impacts, a federal judge in Oregon ruled this week that cattle in an Oregon national forest were damaging threatened steelhead habitat, pointing out that "this court has repeatedly found the grazing program to be insufficiently protective of listed fish species." According to the Associated Press, the ruling could influence a new steelhead biological opinion due next year.

Actually the govt should Pay to have it grazed
Mark Wright
Mark Wright
Jun 25, 2010 08:13 PM
That simple.

80% of the staff for any govt grazing is office staff.
Only 20% of the govt personel now work in the field.

20 years ago things were 180 degrees different ( 80% of em worked in the field and 20% was office staff ) in the govt's operating diametric concerning grazing on public lands.

Bottom line is, though the govt may spin that they're managing the public lands, they Truely are not.

The bulk of the usa govt's non managed land basically sits in non use and thus now "desertifies.

It is BEST if the land is used, ie grazing, logging etc which keeps the land more productive, holds more moisture etc.

The govt has been in the mode of destroying the businesses that DO make the land better for years now.

For the mutual benefit of the whole public, perhaps it's time to get some REAL private management action and USE back out on those public lands ( approx 1/3 of the whole of the land area in the usa, btw ).

 

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  2. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  3. Will the Colorado River reach the Gulf of California once more? | Photographs of last month's historic water pulses....
  4. Locals resist a Bakkenization of the Beartooths | South-central Montanans oppose new drilling, forew...
  5. The toxic legacy of Exxon Valdez | We are just beginning to understand the true cost ...
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone