You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Bring the electrons home
The GOAT Blog

Bring the electrons home

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Nathan Rice | Jan 20, 2011 10:55 AM

On New Year's Day, the city of Boulder, Colo., started down a road toward energy independence by decoupling with their electrical utility, Xcel Energy. After three years of negotiations for more green power failed, Boulder let its 20-year franchise agreement with Xcel expire at the end of 2010.

Boulder windmillNow the future of the city's electrical grid is as wide open as the plains heading east from the Front Range. The move allows the city to ponder new, potentially local sources of electricity to satisfy its aggressive emissions reduction plans while keeping rates low for Boulderites. In the meantime, Xcel will continue to electrify the city at its current mix of 85 percent fossil fuels.

When voters in the environmentally-minded city approved Proposition 2B last election by almost 70 percent, instating a tax to replace Xcel's $4.1 million annual kickback to the city, Boulder's financial freedom from the utility was secured.

Boulder now stands at an energy crossroads, one that other Western communities are facing as they demand affordable, locally controlled clean energy from profit-driven, coal hungry utilities.

"I think it sends a very important message that the Boulder community is not going to continue with the status quo," said Jonathan Koehn, regional sustainability coordinator for Boulder.

The city must now decide whether to hash out a new agreement with Xcel that provides more local control over their energy mix, or get into the electricity business themselves -- a potentially risky move.

To take full control of its power supply, Boulder must become its own electrical municipality, essentially taking out the middleman (Xcel) between electricity generation (coal plants, wind farms, solar arrays) and the light switch. But municipalization is no easy task. It involves acquiring the poles and wires for electricity distribution from Xcel and figuring out how to run an electric utility. Drawn-out legal issues are likely as the city takes a sizable customer base out from under Xcel. Despite these complications, Boulder has much to gain by taking the energy reins.

“It's a very cash-positive and lucrative business for a city to municipalize once you are there,” said Koehn. “Because you are not building in a profit margin, so all of the money stays local.”

Boulder residents paid $90 million in energy bills to Xcel Energy last year. By keeping that cash local, the city could invest in local solar and wind generation (HCN 7/2/09, "Let's Get Small") while keeping rates affordable. Boulder's attempts at reducing energy consumption on the demand side have had mixed results despite enacting the nation's first carbon tax (The Range 2/22/10, "Rolling Boulder up the mountain"). Now they are attacking greenhouse emissions from the energy supply side of the equation.

Communities in California and around the country have opted for a middle path to taking their power back. That path is a policy called community choice aggregation (CCA), which allows communities to purchase energy from where they choose while letting the utility manage the power lines. Marin County, Calif., most recently reclaimed control of their energy sources from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) and now supplies 25 percent renewable energy without increasing electricity rates. Sonoma County, Calif., is undertaking an ambitious plan to localize 67 percent of their electricity generation in the next five years. Similar localization efforts have succeeded in Cape Cod, Mass., and Toledo, Ohio, and CCA laws recently passed in Texas, Illinois and Virginia.

Unfortunately for Boulder, this middle path is not currently allowed under Colorado state law, nor any other Western state except California, says Paul Fenn, an energy consultant who developed the CCA policy in the 1990s. This inability to choose the CCA option could set the city up for a potential showdown with Xcel should it decide to become its own utility.

"Municipalization is gloves off," said Fenn at a presentation in Boulder in November.  "(It) will harm Xcel" by taking away that $90 million in yearly energy bills. "CCA is a little bit softer," he explained. "It doesn't quite take [the utility] out at the knees the way municipalization does. "

Boulder would prefer to work with Xcel, said Koehn, but only if their clean energy needs are met. The city is continuing talks with Xcel and gathering data to help determine what to put on the ballot this November, when voters could decide Boulder's energy future.

Paul Fenn noted the significance of the city's position.

"This would make Boulder a U.S. leader and on the list of world leaders if they go ahead with localization," he said.

"To have a town that has, arguably, critical mass and public support for real movement on green power and localization - That almost never happens," Fenn explained.

Nathan Rice is an HCN Intern

Boulder wind turbine photo courtesy Mike Linenberger, NREL

Green Electricity
James Washington
James Washington
Jan 20, 2011 09:46 PM
It is a fact of life. People will continue to use more and more electricity. Alternate means of electricity production is the key. Wind and solar are our two main "free" sources and we are learning to harness these better every day. All it takes is for everyone to help out just a little bit. http://www.onlineambitenergy.com
CCA option is needed
Steve Snyder
Steve Snyder
Jan 21, 2011 12:34 AM
It takes a city of fair size and fair technical orientation to pull off what Boulder is doing. Some cities bigger than it, especially with tight budgets, wouldn't want to do that.
CCA option good for all-sized governments
Paul Fenn
Paul Fenn
Jan 21, 2011 11:42 AM
Cities with tight budgets need CCA because it takes an existing electric or gas bill monthly charge and invests it in local renewable power and efficiency technologies and owned by customers rather than an out-of-state corporation. With collapsed General Obligation Bond authority resulting from declining property taxes, Revenue Bonds are now the only future source of borrowing by cities large or small. CCAs bring the revenue of hundreds of millions of dollars per year that can be invested - through a Localization Standard - in local projects developed by local businesses. CCA IS A MAJOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CITY GOVERNMENT.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Rancher vs BLM: a 20-year standoff ends with tense roundup |
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  4. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  5. The future of the Sacramento Delta hangs in the balance | But few Californians seem to grasp what is at stak...
  1. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  4. Will the Colorado River reach the Gulf of California once more? | Photographs of last month's historic water pulses....
  5. Locals resist a Bakkenization of the Beartooths | South-central Montanans oppose new drilling, forew...
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone