Personal tools
You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   "Nuclear whack-a-mole"
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
 
The GOAT Blog

"Nuclear whack-a-mole"

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Arla Shephard | Sep 03, 2009 04:46 PM

Last week, attorneys for the state of Utah joined the fray against nuclear-waste disposal company EnergySolutions by filing an appeal against a ruling that would allow the company to import foreign nuclear waste to the state. 

EnergySolutions, a Salt Lake City-based company that disposes of low-level radioactive waste from other states, has been in talks to import up to 20,000 tons of nuclear waste from Italy, a proposal that alarmed both citizens and the state government

“No country in the world imports another country’s nuclear waste," says Vanessa Pierce, executive director of HEAL Utah, a nonprofit grassroots organization that has gotten into the habit of watchdogging EnergySolutions. "If you have the technical capability to generate the waste, you have the technical capability and the moral obligation to dispose it.”

In May, a federal court ruled that EnergySolutions falls outside the regulatory oversight of the Northwest Compact, an eight-state coalition that oversees low-level radioactive-waste management. The ruling cleared the way for the company to dispose of foreign waste, and last week attorneys for Utah, the Northwest Compact and the three-state Rocky Mountain Compact filed an appeal against the decision.

"[The ruling] would encourage non-compact states to continue to send their radioactive waste, without restriction, to a host state like Utah," the state said in its initial arguments at the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. Members of Congress have submitted bills in both Houses this year against importing foreign nuclear waste. 

The issue of radioactive waste has been a sore spot for Utahns since the 1950s, when Utah was downwind from the Nevada atmospheric nuclear test sites. Many Utahns feel that their state has long been treated as a dumping ground for other states' waste. 

"We don't produce this waste, we as a state get nothing from importing it," Pierce says. "Why should we have the risk of importing that (here) ... this is a part of the history of our state that has taken the lives of loved ones."

HEAL Utah has been at odds with EnergySolutions (formerly known as EnviroCare) since 2000, when the nuclear waste company wanted to import hotter classes of nuclear waste into the state. The company had been accepting class A nuclear waste, which decays to a stable state within 100 years, and wanted to accept classes B and C, which take between 300 and 500 years to stabilize. Over the years, the company has also submitted proposals to double the size of its waste facility, both horizontally and vertically, Pierce says.

“It’s like playing nuclear whack-a-mole with them,” she adds. “We’re not trying to shut them down, but let’s not turn any more of our Western desert into a toxic nuclear waste dump.”

nuclear whack-a-mole
Rick Beauheim
Rick Beauheim
Sep 11, 2009 12:29 PM
It would have been nice if the blog had said something about the nature of the waste Energy Solutions wants to import--is the Energy Solutions facility unsuitable for this type of waste? Is there actually anything to be worried about, or is this just another case of mindless Nuclear=BAD? The statement by Vanessa Pierce, "If you have the technical capability to generate the waste, you have the technical capability and the moral obligation to dispose it.” is a peculiar thing to say. It's not as if Italy is secretly dumping its waste somewhere else--it's acting morally by finding a safe, licensed facility for its waste, and paying for its disposal. By Ms. Pierce's logic, you shouldn't be taking your garbage dumpster out to the curb for your weekly garbage pickup--you have a moral obligation to keep it in your backyard.

As for the overall concept of importing foreign waste, consider
this: Many countries around the world do not have the technical capability to create the medical technology needed to diagnose and/or cure their citizens that creates radioactive waste and also lack the technical capability and/or financial resources to dispose of it in a facility in their country. Should we therefore deny them the benefits of modern medical technology, or should we take their small amounts of waste and add them to our much larger amounts in safe disposal facilities (yes, they do exist) under our control?

Let's get off the anti-nuclear bandwagon and start actually thinking things through.
cleanidaho
cleanidaho
cleanidaho
Oct 28, 2009 08:26 AM
Did you know that Westinghouse is trying to send 100 million pounds of Missouri's nuclear waste to Idaho?

Did you know that the site they want to send it to is neither approved by nor regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission?

Does Idaho really want to be a target destination for nuclear waste?

A dedicated group of Idaho citizens is trying to inform everybody it can about this. We could sure use your help!

Come learn more about this at our web site: www.cleanidaho.org.

Thanks!
Citizens for a Clean Idaho, Inc. (not for profit)
 

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Fearful of Agenda 21, an alleged U.N. plot, activists derail land-use planning | A two-year planning process in La Plata County, Co...
  2. Billboard corporations use money and influence to override your vote | In Salt Lake City and other Western communities, b...
  3. The logging town of Darrington, Wash., fights to save a fire lookout | A lawsuit raises questions about how far environme...
  4. Feeding the deer | A rural Californian doesn't apologize for feeding ...
  5. Residents of Montana's High Plains are angry - but not at the real threats | Though climate change and the economy are the issu...
  1. Fearful of Agenda 21, an alleged U.N. plot, activists derail land-use planning | A two-year planning process in La Plata County, Co...
  2. Billboard corporations use money and influence to override your vote | In Salt Lake City and other Western communities, b...
  3. The logging town of Darrington, Wash., fights to save a fire lookout | A lawsuit raises questions about how far environme...
  4. Residents of Montana's High Plains are angry - but not at the real threats | Though climate change and the economy are the issu...
  5. Picking ranchers' brains, from Colorado to Mongolia | Colorado State University professor Maria Fernande...
More from Energy
Air quality and energy development Critics worry about water, but air pollution from oil and gas can also be significant
Beyond control State governments wrestle with locals over the power to regulate oil and gas
EPA grilled over Pavillion report At a House hearing, state officials and industry representatives face off against agency and health scientists
All Energy

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2012 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

- The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

- An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis