Sponsored by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona, and the Arizona Attorney General's Office, a new campaign aims to slow the flow of guns bought in Arizona and smuggled into Mexico.
"Don't lie for the other guy" is currently emblazoned on 92 Tucson billboards and repeated through public service announcements in Spanish and English, reminding people that buying guns and then selling them to someone buying for drug cartels is a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
Of the guns recovered in Mexican crimes that have been traced in the past three years, more than 90 percent came from the United States, according to the ATF -- most from Texas and Arizona.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation is a trade association for the firearms industry, and it's spending $500,000 to roll out the "Don't lie for the other guy" campaign in the border states this summer. Since the "Don't lie" program began in 2000, the NSSF has provided nearly half of the $4.3 million it has cost, with the Department of Justice providing the rest. The NSSF has also worked with the ATF to help gun dealers detect "straw-man buyers."
"We don't want the industry or the dealers to get a black eye or be perceived as the problem here. In fact, the dealers are part of the solution. Dealers are very receptive to the program. They don't want to be associated with a gun that was used to kill somebody," Lawrence Keane, senior vice president of the NSSF, told the Arizona Daily Star.
According to the ATF, there are 7,300 licensed retail gun dealers and pawn brokers operating in the Southwest border region.
They’re all participating, in one way or another, in the Clear Creek restoration project at the Arapaho National Forest this Saturday, as part of the National Forest Foundation’s third annual Friends of the Forest Day. Other partners include the National Forest Foundation, the Clear Creek Watershed Foundation and the Colorado Division of Wildlife.
“Clear Creek is a major water supply for 20 cities and towns, from Idaho Springs to the Denver-Boulder area,” says Jim Maxwell, a spokesman for the U.S. Forest Service. “People as far down as Omaha, Nebraska drink water from this watershed.”
Volunteers from MillerCoors, Trout Unlimited and the microbiology department of the University of Colorado Denver are seeding native plants along Clear Creek, creating wetland ponds for native boreal toads to colonize, and repairing stream beds by planting vegetation and building buck-and-rail fences to block vehicle access. Eventually, the native greenback cutthroat trout (Colorado’s official state fish) will be re-introduced to the stream.
Volunteers participate in last year's Friends of the Forest Day.
“The real value is getting local people who care about the quality of their water and fish habitats together to do the work in their own back yard,” Maxwell says. “They’re investing their sweat and in the case of MillerCoors $40,000 of their own money to heal wounds on the land.”
It wasn't really my intention, but I was part of the "rural renaissance" of the 1970s when, for the first time in generations, many rural areas starting gaining population. In 1974, my wife and I, both Baby Boomers, moved from the civilized Front Range piedmont of Colorado to a rather remote rural area -- the town of Kremmling in Grand County, Colorado, which then had about 5,000 people.
We weren't moving "back to the land," since about all you could grow in Middle Park was hay, on account of less than a month of frost-free growing season. The move came because the only newspaper job I could find was editing the weekly Middle Park Times in Kremmling.
But we've remained in rural Colorado ever since with its ups (1970s and 1990s) and downs (1980s and perhaps the 2000s).
It may be time for another Baby Boomer migration to the boondocks, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture summarized on newgeography.com, one of my favorite websites.
"As many boomers end child-rearing duties, enter peak employment earnings and ponder retirement options they are now poised to significantly increase the population of 55-75 year olds in rural and small town America through 2020, with major social and economic implications for their chosen locations," the summary says.
It predicts that growth will come to "rural places with high levels of natural amenities and affordable housing that are already popular as second-home destinations. For these areas the economic future looks good as a potential influx of spending power and seasoned, footloose talent boosts development prospects."
I can't say I'm thrilled about "development prospects," but as recent history demonstrates, these things tend to come and go.
Ten simple words.
For the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde in western Oregon, ten words introduced into an existing law would restore their relationship with the land upon which their ancestors lived. Other tribes, however, consider the move risky.
Last month, Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) introduced a bill in Congress that would add the Grand Ronde to the list of four tribal groups who currently have treaty and consulting rights in the Columbia River Gorge area under the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act of 1986. The Grand Ronde tribes, who were forcibly removed from their homeland along the Columbia River in 1855-56, were busy fighting for federal recognition and a reservation when the law was passed.
“It’s a matter of simple justice,” says Siobhan Taylor, public affairs director for the Grand Ronde. “When Lewis and Clark came to the area they mention meeting speakers of the Chinook languages … descendants of those speakers are members of the tribe today.”Read More ...
In an attempt to clear the craziness clouding the health care debate and drum up support for a public option, President Obama parachuted into unfriendly territory last Saturday—and not for the first time. It was his second visit to Grand Junction, Colo., in conservative Mesa County, where John McCain spanked him last year, 64 to 34 percent.
Obama made his first pit stop in GJ while on the campaign trail last fall. And though he appeared this time as sitting President, the event had all the makings of a campaign gathering: fans and protesters, rolled-up shirt sleeves, Obama-brand rally signs, and echoes of the man as candidate:
These struggles have always boiled down to a contest between hope and fear. It was true when Social Security was born. It was true when Medicare was created. It's true in today's debate.
So if you want a different future—a brighter future—I need your help. I need you to stand for hope. I need you to knock on doors. I need you to spread the word, because we are going to get this done this year.
Read More ...
Sound familiar? Obama’s back on the campaign trail, and back to relying on the rhetoric and strategery that won him the presidency—given how it worked out last time, it isn’t a bad game plan.
Promoting his health care package, President Obama will appear Saturday, August 15 in Grand Junction, Colorado, where some of Western Colorado's angry natives are primed -- by right-wing talk show host Glenn Beck and others -- to vent their opposition, not just to Obama's health care proposal but to his presidency as a whole.
Some 4,000 people -- not only from Western Colorado but also from the Front Range, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico and Nevada -- are expected to attend an anti-Obama rally in the morning (the President speaks at 4 pm). The Western Slope Conservative Alliance has organized a string of speakers to speak against Obama and his policies, including state Sen. Josh Penry (angling for the GOP nomination for governor) and U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).
According to the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel, opposition groups are planning to line streets around Central High School (where the President will make his appearance), but are not planning to attend the town hall meeting inside.
Meanwhile, Obama's Organizing for America group is asking people to come out to support the President.
Should be quite a show.
HCN's Cally Carswell will be live-Tweeting the event starting around 4 pm Mountain Time.
On July 12, a gang member brutally attacked a female police officer on the Oglala Sioux’s Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota.
The officer was forced to shoot the suspect and is now in hiding with her family, said John Mousseau, chairman of the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council, at a hearing in D.C. last month. The same officer makes $35,000 a year with no health benefits and no retirement package, he added.
Mousseau and other tribal leaders from across the West gathered before the U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs to discuss the increased amount of gang activity plaguing reservations all over the country. The violence is taking a toll on tribal law enforcement offices that are often understaffed, underfunded and overworked.
“We do more with little,” said Sampson Cowboy, director of the Department of Public Safety on the Navajo Nation in Arizona, where there are now 225 documented gangs, compared to 75 gangs in 1997. “We have 0.06 police officers for every 1,000 people... and answer 289,000 calls every year.”
Read More ...
The title of this blog has a horror movie ring to it. It even sounds a little too ridiculous to be real. But for High Country News staffer Tammy York, it's the truth. This isn't the sort of thing we usually report on, but it's a pretty incredible (and tragic) story to have so close to home. (And, being cutthroat journalists, we couldn't let the L.A. Times -- they plan to call Tammy tonight -- get this on record before we do.)
Back in 2002, Tammy moved into a basement apartment in Donna Munson's quiet log house, nestled on a densely vegetated 40-ish acre parcel between the small mountain towns of Ridgeway and Ouray, Colo. Munson had put an ad in the paper, but at first she resisted the idea of Tammy becoming her tenant. Not because Tammy had lots of loud parties or 50 cats (she didn't), mind you, but because Tammy had two young children: a one-year-old daughter, and a four-year-old son. As Tammy quickly found out, Munson was worried about the kids because she was in the habit of feeding several black bears, right off of her upstairs deck.Read More ...
Geez, it seems like it was just a few months ago that the natural gas boom was busting and the drill rigs were sent a-packin'. Natural gas prices cratered, thanks to the general economic malaise, and big shale gas plays in other parts of the country really dug into the West's drilling boom. Meanwhile, all the folks losing their jobs on the rigs blamed stricter regulations (and environmentalists and Democrats) for their woes. Now, it looks like natural gas is poised for a comeback. And who's touting it the most? Environmentalists and Democrats!
The arguments are honest and even reasonable, to a degree: Natural gas emits about half the carbon dioxide as coal, and right now natural gas is not too pricey. Furthermore, switching from coal plants to natural gas plants would be cheaper and quicker than building the equivalent solar, wind or even nuclear generation. In many cases, the infrastructure and transmission already exists to, first, ramp up existing natural gas plants, and then to switch coal to gas or cofire. Meanwhile, recent projections say that, thanks to deep shale gas finds, there's plenty of gas to be drilled.
Still, the about face of greens and Dems on this issue has been shocking ... sort of. A few months ago, some of these same folks were demonized by the natural gas industry because of their push for more regs. Now, well... when the drill rigs return to your neighborhood, these are some of the folks you can thank:Read More ...
Drought intensified this summer throughout California and most of the West. Already over-allocated, water supplies are short across most of the West prompting irrigation cutbacks, dewatered streams, endangered species conflicts and protests in irrigation-dominated areas like the west-side of California’s San Joaquin Valley. Drought also exacerbates water quality problems; less streamflow means more concentration of pollutants and greater negative impacts to fish and other Public Trust resources.
Under these circumstances the April announcement from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack that the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) would distribute $84.8 million for “vital watershed projects” was especially welcome. Vilsack recently announced another 42.3 million in recovery funds for watershed projects. Both amounts are part of the federal government’s economic stimulus program. Many funded projects are located in the West. According to USDA information, most western projects will pay for infrastructure and equipment to enhance on-farm irrigation efficiency.
Read More ...