If you need to stay indoors because it's cold, wet and windy outside, or because you worry about being mistaken for an elk if you go outdoors, here's some good reading.
In the New Republic, Jackson Lears provides a thought-provoking essay that combines review of six environmental books, among them an anthology of American nature writing, a biography of John Muir, and a historic connection between conservation and eugenics.
I couldn't help but keep reading after this opening: "In contemporary public discourse, concern for 'the environment' is a mile wide and an inch deep. Even free-market fundamentalists strain to display their ecological credentials, while corporations that sell fossil fuels genuflect at the altar of sustainability. Everyone has discovered how nice it is to be green. Will popular sentiment translate into public policy? There is reason to be skeptical."
Another interesting piece I recently encountered looks at population trends across America, specifically death rates and immigration rates. There I discovered that my Chaffee County, Colorado, would be losing population if it were limited to natural increase and decrease; we and some neighbors are growing. The article notes that "The bulk of these [growing] counties are retirement amenity areas, mostly but not entirely in the Sunbelt, and mostly but not entirely in the south and west."
It will come as no surprise that most farm counties on the Great Plains are losing population, both by natural decrease as an older population dies off without replacement births, and by out-migration because residents seek better economic opportunities. The author, Richard Morrill, predicts that we'll see more shrinking county populations in coming years.
Last fall, we wrote about the enormous amounts of greenhouse gas vented by coal mines (in the West, methane emissions from mines are equivalent to the emissions from 1.9 million cars). And methane, an explosive gas vented for miner safety, is 21 times more potent than carbon dioxide in terms of heat-trapping.
At many East Coast coal mines, the methane is captured and burned for energy, but in the West, various regulatory and jurisdictional issues have made it difficult or impossible for mines to do so (for example, a company that has a mining lease on public land must obtain a separate lease to capture methane released from its mines).
Read More ...
Last Monday, I drove over McClure Pass to Carbondale, Colo., to join NPR reporter Jeff Brady, Rocky Mountain Community Radio correspondent Bente Birkeland, Aspen Times columnist Paul Anderson, and KDNK community radio News Director Conrad Wilson for a lively (and live) discussion of Western issues and how they play out in Colorado.
You can find the original broadcast here, on KDNK's Web site.
All summer long, farmers in California’s Central Valley have complained about their parched fields—one even likened their communities to tumbleweeds about to blow away—and they blame their thirsty crops on fish. Endangered Species Act protections for smelt and salmon in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta limit the amount of water pumped out of Northern California, much of which goes to agriculture.
But these struggling farmers, and others in the West, are getting some attention from Obama’s administration this week.
On Wednesday Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced he would ask the National Academy of Sciences to review the scientific reasoning behind the ESA limits on Northern California water pumping. The LA Times reports:
“State water officials say most of the delivery cuts from the delta are the result of drought—not the fish protections—but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Central Valley congressmen have repeatedly denounced the endangered species restrictions as placing fish above people.”
Salazar asked the academy to find out if there are other fish protection measures that would use less water, but remarked that it was “wrong to blame California’s water problems on environmental regulation.” And one columnist argues that both farmers and fishermen are in the same "dry-docked" boat, since water shortages have heavily affected both industries--keeping farm fields fallow and the salmon season closed for a second consecutive year.
Meanwhile, Hispanic farmers in New Mexico aired their discrimination complaints when U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack visited Las Cruces, N.M., on Wednesday. Vilsack listened to the concerns of southern New Mexico farmers, who said that the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency had administered loans and service to white farmers first, causing many Hispanic farmers to lose their land or crops because of delayed loans. Vilsack said he was aware of the situation but that “his hands were tied by the judicial system,” according to the Associated Press.
A lawsuit filed by farmers in 2000 charges the USDA with “rampant discrimination in the administration of USDA loan programs,” and a court meeting on Oct. 13 will assess any progress in the suit. Plaintiff’s attorney Stephen Hill said the case has been “stonewalled” by the USDA and Department of Justice, reported the AP.
“Each farmer out there had the same story about discrimination,” David Cantu (a Texas farmer) said. “I commend the secretary and we know he is not the cause of these problems. But fortunately, it has fallen on his administration to make it right.”
Why are mountain snowpacks melting sooner these days?
Part of it may be climate change associated with increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but there's something else in the air -- dust (a/k/a airborne particulate matter).
Snow reflects sunlight quite well, as evidenced by the blinding glare it produces and the phenomenon of snow-blindness.
Put a layer of dust atop the snow, though, and more of the sun's energy is absorbed, rather than reflected. The absorbed solar energy makes the snow melt faster (see our story "Dust and Snow").
And in recent years, as shown by sediment layers in western ponds and lakes, humans have greatly increased the amount of dust in the air, leading to earlier melting.
This has major implications for water managers who rely on alpine snowbanks for storage, and there's more in this article.
In July, after $14.2 million was cut from the California State Parks' operating budget, it looked like up to 100 parks might have to close to make ends meet. Park supporters have thus spent the last few months anxiously speculating about which parks would fall to Governor Schwarzenegger's death panels. But today they got a reprieve.
Macho B's death, contentious and untimely, could also be criminal.
The capture, collaring and euthanization of America’s last known wild jaguar in March was illegal, according to the Center for Biological Diversity, who brought a lawsuit against Arizona Game and Fish Department yesterday. The Center asserts that AZ Game and Fish did not have the required permits to allow the capture of endangered jaguars, and seeks to prevent the state agency from any other similar captures until it gets all the necessary permits.
This lawsuit is separate from a criminal investigation of Macho B’s treatment that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service undertook in April, which will look into "all aspects of the incident." Tucson congressman Raul Grijalva, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Defenders of Wildlife pushed for a federal investigation after concerns were raised regarding whether Macho B's capture was intentional or not, reported the Arizona Daily Star, which has been following the issue.
“We hope that the Fish and Wildlife Service will seek accountability and justice for the loss of the last known jaguar in United States,” said Michael Robinson of the Center. “Our suit is about preventing future harm to jaguars in the United States,” according to the press release.
While protection and appropriate treatment of the iconic feline is admirable and important, it's unfortunate that this comes after the killing of the last known wild one, which ultimately may have been unnecessary: Was our last wild jaguar euthanized by mistake?
What a pleasure it was to ride Amtrak's Pioneer route, which ran from Salt Lake City to Boise, through Oregon to Portland and north to Seattle. The route operated from 1977 to 1997, hooking up with the California Zephyr to service riders in Colorado.
I remember one fabulous trip to LaGrande, Oregon, getting off at the old train station there, direct from Denver -- whereas now I fly into Boise and drive several hours to eastern Oregon in order to pay a visit. A long train ride with a sleeping berth is just about heaven for travelers. There's the soothing rhythm of wheels on tracks, the dining car with its bright white linen tablecloths, the club car with its easy camaraderie, and -- best of all -- lying on a sleeping berth watching the moon move in and out of clouds as you roll across the open country, drifting into sleep like a baby being rocked by mama.
Read More ...
The precise number of people who recently rallied in Washington, D.C., for a national "tea party" is hard to come by. Left-wing reports have it at less than a hundred thousand participants, while some right-wingers put it over a million.
Whatever the count, it was refreshing that so many people were concerned about "out-of-control government." It would be easier to take them seriously if they had marched eight years ago to oppose warrantless wire-taps, indefinite detentions, torture and the like, but better late than never.
One persistent big-government complaint I've encountered concerns our familiar incandescent light bulbs. In 2007, Congress passed a law mandating new efficiency standards. It didn't exactly outlaw incandescent lamps, but no such bulb on the market then could meet the standard -- which was easily met by the odd-looking compact fluorescent bulbs.
Why would anyone object to a lower electric bill from more efficient lighting? I don't recall any anger about the improved efficiency standards for electric refrigerators that took effect in 1993.
Well, there are some people who get headaches from fluorescent bulbs. They've never bothered me -- my indoor work history includes many hours under sickly blue-tinged light in newspaper offices and industrial laundry washrooms -- and such headaches as I suffered had nothing to do with the light.
But I am married to a woman who sometimes reacts adversely to bluish fluorescents, and I prefer the warm yellow glow of incandescents. Neither of us, however, is fond of paying any more than necessary to Xcel Energy. We've replaced most household incandescents with CFLs that mimic the warm glow, and so far, it's worked out pretty well. The light has a tone that pleases me, it doesn't give Martha headaches, and we consume less electricity.
Further, I read that the incandescent lamp is becoming more efficient, and the new ones will meet the 2012 standards.
Even so, there's still the complaint that "the damn government is telling us what kind of light bulbs to use."
And I thought "doesn't the government already tell us what kind of light to use?" For instance, our Victorian forebears used gas lights, and surely they're illegal now, given the heat and fire hazard.
Some nosing around the Internet produced a site devoted to gas lights, which pointed out some modern safety features that shut off the gas if the flame goes out, so that the building doesn't turn into a bomb. It also said their legality is determined by local building codes.
I called Bill Paradise, a Chaffee County, Colo. building inspector (the office also conducts inspections in our county's three municipalities).
He told me that your insurance company might have problems if you used gas lights, but they're allowed under the International Building Code used here and in many other jurisdictions.
Blinding electric arc lights? No problem with the building code, he said, and the same held for hot halogen lamps, kerosene and gasoline lanterns, lime lights (hydrogen and oxygen aimed at calcium oxide, used in 19th-century theaters and thus the phrase "in the limelight"), acetylene, candles, whatever other illumination I could think of.
He said the only lighting measure in the International Building Code used by the county was a requirement that recessed lighting fixtures be sealed.
Thus I was wrong when I thought that "the government" already regulated what kinds of lighting you could use in your own home.
And if you're really fond of those inefficient incandescent bulbs that turn 90 percent of their electricity into heat rather than the light you want, you can still use them -- you'll just need to stock up now, or develop a black-market connection, because someday soon you won't be able to buy them legally, and they do burn out.
There has been little noise made about the EPA's relocation of seven Navajo families living near the former Church Rock uranium mine in northwestern New Mexico. Scouring the Internet, I could only find one brief article in the Gallup Independent.
The news was brought to my attention last week, when Cally Carswell and I met with youth activists in Albuquerque on a reporting trip focusing on environmental justice.
"[The EPA] told families they had to move two to three weeks before they were moved," says Leona Morgan, a youth activist who grew up on the Navajo reservation. "They didn't know where, or if they were going to get a food stipend."
The families who were moved live nearest to the 97,000 cubic yards of contaminated top soil that General Electric and United Nuclear Corp. are spending $5 million to remove. The EPA's decision to relocate the families for five months to hotels in Gallup came as a surprise to other residents of the area, primarily because the decision seemed so haphazard, Morgan says.Read More ...