You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   A pack of problems for wolves
The GOAT Blog

A pack of problems for wolves

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Jodi Peterson | Jan 15, 2009 01:30 PM

This past year, the West’s wolves have had an even rougher time of it than usual. In the Northern Rockies, they’ve been bounced on and off the endangered species list, and in Yellowstone, more than usual have died. In the Southwest, it’s back to the drawing board after reintroduction plans failed miserably.

After the Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming last February, hunters immediately shot more than a dozen. Enviros sued, and last September the agency agreed to keep the predators listed until it could determine whether wolves would survive long-term without Endangered Species Act protections. That decision apparently didn’t require much extra thought – the agency just announced that it will again take wolves off the list (except in Wyoming, where the state has yet to come up with a reasonable management plan). Expect another lawsuit.

Meanwhile, for the first time in three years, the wolf population of Yellowstone has dropped. The northern range lost 40 percent of its wolves in 2008, while packs in the interior part of the park were down by 11 percent, due to distemper, mange, and fatal fights between rivals. The park now has 124 individuals and just 6 breeding pairs, the fewest since 2000. Wildlife populations fluctuate naturally from year to year, though, so it’s hard to say whether this represents a trend.

Speaking of population declines, the feds recently admitted that their 1982 plan for recovering the Mexican wolf has not worked and needs a major overhaul. Only about 50 Mexican wolves now roam free in Arizona and New Mexico, while federal officials have killed or removed more than 50 over the past decade for preying on livestock. Fish and Wildlife blames its failure to develop a new plan for the Mexican wolf on all the litigation over the gray wolf.

Wolves have shown us over and over that all they really need is for humans to leave them alone and give them some space. At this point, it's not wolves who need managing -- it's people.

Give Lobos a Leg Up!
Rob Edward
Rob Edward
Jan 20, 2009 09:06 AM
The government is managing the imperiled Mexican wolf population based on a plan that was finalized before the advent of the personal computer. That's why the Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians and The Rewilding Institute filed a petition with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in December 2008 to revise the 1982 recovery plan. It's time to bring the lobo recovery effort into the 21st Century. Moreover, it's time for the government to stop putting lobos on the ground with one hand and then killing them with the other on behalf of the livestock industry--they'll be extinct in the wild (again) if that keeps up.
wolves
Hilary Richardson
Hilary Richardson
Feb 04, 2009 12:33 AM
I used to be for the wolves and I agree that they do serve a purpose, however I have personally seen the impact they have had on local wildlife. We need to be realistic about the situation. I am concerned that our other wildlife populations may become endangered. These wolves are killers and waste so much. If we don't wise up and come up with a better management plan, we are going to have a big mess on our hands. The United states isn't the wide open frontier it used to be. We have limited space and a huge population of people now. Things have changed. I don't like it any more than anyone else, but we can't have things like we did in the 1800s. It just won't work. I know several environmentalist that were on the rampage with the government and wanting to save the wolves, then they saw the devastation to other wildlife and learned of their impact and have changed their minds. Please people be reasonable. I encourage you to visit the mountains of Idaho and Montana and look for yourself if you don't believe me.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  2. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  3. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  4. Save our gauges | Important USGS stream gauges imperiled by austerit...
  5. (Still) getting the lead out | When will hunters stop poisoning condors with ammu...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. Sacrificial Land: Will renewable energy devour the Mojave Desert? | An unlikely group of activists is championing a ne...
  3. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  4. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
  5. Trappers catch a lot more than wolves | Mountain lions, eagles, bobcats, geese and domesti...
More from Flora & Fauna
It's Endangered Species Day! 40 years on and the ESA continues to have growing pains
In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and trappers to reduce wolf populations, a Montana couple is dedicated to their hunt.
The danger of too much screentime, in and out of the woods Stewardship demands boots on the ground, but will the next generation rise to the challenge?
All Flora & Fauna

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.