Subscription Preview

To read the full article, you must log in or subscribe. Enter your email address:

Considering historical correctness in New Mexico

Kit Carson’s name is everywhere on maps of the West. Nevada’s capital city is named after him, and in California, a Carson Pass crosses the Sierra Nevada. Colorado has Carson County, a town named Kit Carson and 14,000-foot Kit Carson Peak. But was the man himself really worth honoring?

A few years before Carson died in 1868, at a town in Colorado called Boggsville, he’d reluctantly fought the Navajo Indians in the Southwest, acting on behalf of the U.S. government. The brute strength of the U.S. Army prevailed, and in what the tribe remembers as their Long March, the defeated Navajos were forced onto a reservation in southeastern New Mexico.

That military campaign, and the long march in which so many Navajos died, continues to be remembered by some people with bitterness. This June, in New Mexico, for example, elected officials in Taos decided to remove Carson’s name from the 19-acre park, where he and his third and final wife, Josefa Jaramillo Carson, are buried.

Instead, the councilors renamed the park Red Willow, using the English translation of the Pueblo word for Taos. But after the Taos Pueblo objected, claiming proprietary use of the Red Willow name, the council restored Carson’s name, while also pledging to consider nominations for a new name in the hope that maybe there’s one out there that nobody will find objectionable.

It’s not surprising that New Mexico remains deeply conflicted about its history. Though the Spanish conquistadors of the 1500s and 1600s have been memorialized with statues of heroic-looking men on horseback, several of those statues have been vandalized and in some cases spray-painted with the words “murderer” and “killer.”

But even in Taos, not everybody agrees that Carson’s name should be forgotten. “The big backlash that I’m getting from this community is ‘Don’t we have bigger fish to fry beyond the renaming of the park?’ ” asked Councilman Andrew Gonzales in The Taos News. Another councilman conceded that the name change accomplishes little: “The problem we have with bigotry or intolerance or any of these issues or conflicts between cultures is not going to be settled by the naming of the park,” Fred Peralta told the same newspaper.

Comments about this article

Bob Laybourn Subscriber
Aug 30, 2014 01:30 PM
Custer, Miles, Sheridan and a number of infamous Army officers have been honored in the naming of towns, counties and geographical features. I say leave their names as testament to the history of the American West.
Michael Welsh Subscriber
Aug 31, 2014 12:57 PM
A new generation needs to examine Carson and all other historical figures to see how the latter should be remembered. The pro- and anti-Carson debate, as Wayne Trujillo points out, may not make sense to those who are seeking their own identities and answers. Carson is everything everyone has said about him (good and bad), but if he were to return today he might say that there's more to know than we've wanted to hear.

From our friends

A constant commitment to the environment

Needless to say, we love and appreciate the fine work all of you do to illustrate the importance of our constant commitment to the environment.

Thanks to all of you for illuminating the critical issues of our world, country and the West. Keep up the great work!

Jeff and Lisa,
Atlanta, Georgia

Inspiring words from a die hard reader:

"I subscribed to HCN for a number of years, loved every issue...I stopped subscribing because my work load escalated. It was ok the first few months but after six months I was regretting the decision...the relevance of HCN did not diminish. I continued to look at the enticing titles of articles in the online newsletter but couldn't read enough to satisfy the craving. So I'm back. I also kicked in another 50 bucks as a personal reminder that quality reporting is not free."

Robert E. Hall, Washington D.C.