-
Don’t worry so much about what President Bush will
do to the environment; worry instead about the three new justices
he might put on the Supreme Court
by Jon Margolis,
Dec 06, 2004
-
Even when environmentalists win in the courtroom, Congress
can overturn the court’s interpretation of an existing law by
passing a new one
by Laura Paskus,
Feb 16, 2004
-
Newly confirmed Chief Justice John Roberts may not be the
umpire he claims to be, but he could be worse: a
counter-revolutionary, like Judge Janice Rogers Brown
by Jon Margolis,
Oct 31, 2005
-
The increasing politicization of the courts is creating a
hazardous landscape for conservationists, who need to diligently
oppose anti-environmental judges
by Paul Larmer,
Feb 16, 2004
-
The writer outlines the ideological underpinnings of
judicial flip flips on key Western issues
by Ray Ring,
Mar 22, 2004
-
The environmental records of federal judges are briefly
examined, including Dee Benson, Don Molloy, Alan Angus McDonald, B.
Lynn Winmill, Michael Hogan, Edward Lodge, Clarence Brimmer, James
Parker and Sam Haddon
by Ray Ring,
Feb 16, 2004
-
The writer celebrates a jury decision in Boise,
Idaho
by Ben Long,
Jun 14, 2004
-
The West’s environmentalist lawyers are manning the
legal barricades, as the Bush administration stealthily attacks the
nation’s bedrock environmental laws
by Ray Ring,
May 10, 2004
-
In Western states where judges are elected, an increasing
amount of special-interest group money is being spent on hotly
contested state judge campaigns
by Ray Ring,
Oct 11, 2004
-
A recent Supreme Court ruling in a Utah wilderness lawsuit
will limit the ability of citizens to sue the government over how
its agencies manage natural resources
by Ray Ring,
Jul 19, 2004